Net Grading Nightmare 上市 Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Re

文章內容
  • From rogermoore435@yahoo.com Fri Jun 20 12:53:34 2003
    Return-Path: <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: rogermoore435@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 15810 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2003 19:53:33 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Jun 2003 19:53:33 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web40512.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.78.129)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2003 19:53:33 -0000
    Message-ID: <20030620195333.21418.qmail@web40512.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [68.45.17.138] by web40512.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:53:33 PDT
    Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Net Grading Nightmare
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: <3EF3638A.D14DC400@hsc.wvu.edu>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    From: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=65078925
    X-Yahoo-Profile: rogermoore435

    Stan, This string of messages is beginning to thin.
    In order to perk it up, I will indicate that less than
    perfect coins should be called - cats!! Roger


    --- Stan Stephens <sstephens@hsc.wvu.edu> wrote:
    > I have heard Jim Long (JEL coins)use the P-I-G word
    > to describe coins he
    > owned and had for sale. Its hard to make a counter
    > comment.
    > Stan
    >
    > jkraljevich wrote:
    > >
    > > Unless anyone has a pet pig, I've always been
    > partial to that term
    > > for a particularly ugly copper.
    > >
    > > To paraphrase Animal House, ?that coin is a P-I-G
    > pig.?
    > >
    > > Of course, if you do have a pet pig, perhaps this
    > is not the place
    > > for a confession.
    > >
    > > JK
    > >
    > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Roger Moore
    > > ?rogermoore435@y...? wrote:
    > > ? Ray, I hope we are good enogh friends for you
    > to know
    > > ? when I am pulling your leg!! Roger
    > > ?
    > > ?
    > > ? --- Ray Williams ?njraywms@o...? wrote:
    > > ? ? Roger,
    > > ? ? If you like dogs so much, we should swap
    > > ? ? collections ?BG?. Maybe it may
    > > ? ? have been a poor choice of words, but all knew
    > what
    > > ? ? I meant. I will attempt
    > > ? ? to keep this in mind when I describe coins in
    > the
    > > ? ? future that are much less
    > > ? ? than beautiful. ?s?
    > > ? ? Ray W
    > > ? ? ----- Original Message -----
    > > ? ? From: ?Roger Moore? ?rogermoore435@y...?
    > > ? ? To: ?colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com?
    > > ? ? Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:31 AM
    > > ? ? Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Net
    > Grading
    > > ? ? Nightmare
    > > ? ?
    > > ? ?
    > > ? ? ? I object to the use of the word ?dog? in a
    > > ? ? derogatory
    > > ? ? ? manner. Dogs are God's gift from heaven. I
    > have
    > > ? ? ? never met a dog I didn't like - even ones
    > that
    > > ? ? bite
    > > ? ? ? coins!!! Roger
    > > ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? --- Ray Williams ?njraywms@o...? wrote:
    > > ? ? ? ? Now we're on the same page. That I agree
    > to.
    > > ? ? ? ? Colonial collectors have the
    > > ? ? ? ? best attitudes about the hobby and their
    > coins
    > > ? ? and
    > > ? ? ? ? the coins of others. I
    > > ? ? ? ? have never shown any of my coins to others
    > and
    > > ? ? heard
    > > ? ? ? ? a negative comment.
    > > ? ? ? ? With the exception of one or two, I think
    > that
    > > ? ? over
    > > ? ? ? ? 90% of us have coins in
    > > ? ? ? ? our collections that are real ?dogs? to
    > look at,
    > > ? ? but
    > > ? ? ? ? we don't belittle
    > > ? ? ? ? others coins and there's always something
    > to
    > > ? ? like
    > > ? ? ? ? about every colonial.
    > > ? ? ? ? Ray W
    > > ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ----- Original Message -----
    > > ? ? ? ? From: ?John Lorenzo? ?johnmenc@o...?
    > > ? ? ? ? To: ?colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com?
    > > ? ? ? ? Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:34 PM
    > > ? ? ? ? Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Net
    > Grading
    > > ? ? ? ? Nightmare
    > > ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? All I can say to this Ray as I can not
    > > ? ? remember an
    > > ? ? ? ? EAC meeting at any
    > > ? ? ? ? ? convention when the subject matter did
    > not
    > > ? ? involve
    > > ? ? ? ? grading to some
    > > ? ? ? ? ? degree. Instead of talking coins is
    > always
    > > ? ? ? ? grading-grading-grading.
    > > ? ? ? ? ? When an EAC person picks up a large cent
    > its
    > > ? ? ? ? usually ?what is wrong
    > > ? ? ? ? ? with this coin.? I can only speak for
    > myself -
    > > ? ? ? ? when I pick up a
    > > ? ? ? ? ? colonial its ?What is GOOD about this
    > coin!?
    > > ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? Now its NUFF SAID!!!
    > > ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com,
    > Ray
    > > ? ? ? ? Williams ?njraywms@o...?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? wrote:
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? I was a little afraid of this
    > happening...
    > > ? ? I
    > > ? ? ? ? was hoping to avoid
    > > ? ? ? ? ? specifics
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? of the difficulties experienced in EAC
    > > ? ? grading
    > > ? ? ? ? over the years. I
    > > ? ? ? ? ? wanted to
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? just use general concerns from EAC
    > grading
    > > ? ? and
    > > ? ? ? ? try not to fall into
    > > ? ? ? ? ? the same
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? pits. We should learn from what
    > others have
    > > ? ? ? ? done, whether positive
    > > ? ? ? ? ? or
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? negative lessons. This is not my
    > egroup so
    > > ? ? I
    > > ? ? ? ? can't determine
    > > ? ? ? ? ? what's said or
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? not said on these posts. But I would
    > be
    > > ? ? ? ? offended if C4 problems
    > > ? ? ? ? ? were
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? discussed in detail on the EAC egroup
    > and we
    > > ? ? ? ? weren't a part of it.
    > > ? ? ? ? ? So if
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? there's no objections, can we make
    > reference
    > > ? ? to
    > > ? ? ? ? the general EAC
    > > ? ? ? ? ? grading when
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? we're making comparisons... I'll say
    > no
    > > ? ? more -
    > > ? ? ? ? as Rob would
    > > ? ? ? ? ? say, ?Nuff
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Said?.
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Ray W
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ----- Original Message -----
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? From: ?John Lorenzo? ?johnmenc@o...?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? To: ?colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:09 PM
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re:
    > Net
    > > ? ? Grading
    > > ? ? ? ? Nightmare
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ?
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The net grade becomes a problem
    > because
    > > ? ? each
    > > ? ? ? ? ?individual? will
    > > ? ? ? ? ? reduce
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? a coin a certain amount numerically
    > with
    > > ? ? no
    > > ? ? ? ? constant set of
    > > ? ? ? ? ? factors
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? in place for this reduction other
    > than the
    > > ? ? net
    > > ? ? ? ? grader's opinion.
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Noyes hated porosity and I had seen
    > VF-20
    > > ? ? ? ? Large Cents coins
    > > ? ? ? ? ? reduced
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? to G-6 levels simply due to
    > porosity. I
    > > ? ? know I
    > > ? ? ? ? BOUGHT a few. Which
    > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? was good for me and bad for the
    > consigner.
    > > ? ? ? ? Anywhere else it was a
    >
    === message truncated ===


    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
    http://sbc.yahoo.com
來源網址 發布日期
  • 2003-06-20
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者