"Comments" in .JPG files....ad nausaum Public Deposited

Re

[Colonial Numismatics] STILL MORE

Article content
  • From CMcdon0923@aol.com Sun Apr 17 19:33:48 2005
    Return-Path: <CMcdon0923@aol.com>
    X-Sender: CMcdon0923@aol.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 46622 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2005 02:33:48 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
    by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2005 02:33:48 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m22.mx.aol.com) (64.12.137.3)
    by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 02:33:48 -0000
    Received: from CMcdon0923@aol.com
    by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38.7.) id r.89.2539d037 (3924)
    for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:33:36 -0400 (EDT)
    Message-ID: <89.2539d037.2f947680@aol.com>
    Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:33:36 EDT
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1113791616"
    X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5011
    X-Originating-IP: 64.12.137.3
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
    From: CMcdon0923@aol.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] STILL MORE: "Comments" in .JPG files....ad nausaum
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2446688
    X-Yahoo-Profile: cmcdon0923

    -------------------------------1113791616
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    In a message dated 4/17/05 6:55:04 AM Central Daylight Time,
    JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET writes:

    I am becoming very weary with this arguing that is going on. Please -
    either learn to use the software that is on your computer or choose some other
    hobby like fishing or mountain climbing or rock hounding. The Digital
    Millennium has yet to impact those hobbies as it has Numismatics.


    I think a lot of us are growing weary of this topic Jim, for various
    reasons. I think by now it should be obvious to you and everyone, that not all
    image processing software possesses the capabilities you think they do. While
    various levels of computer proficiency certainly exist on this list, I believe
    that there are several members knowledgeable enough in PCs, to prove beyond
    reasonable doubt that your assumptions are incorrect.

    And if I may, I'd like to go back to square one, and ask you: EXACTLY why is
    this embedded information such a big deal? Other than the fact that the
    information CAN be included with an image (assuming the proper software is
    available to view it), what VALUE does it bring to the table? Is it just a
    "nicety" or is there a true purpose for it? If all it shows is who took the image,
    and on what date, and what F ratio they used, and what exposure length, and
    what the "x and y" pixel sizes are, and a copyright statement.....who cares?

    Again, just because you CAN do something, does that mean you should? Have
    you ever heard the joke about male dogs? It's essentially the same point.


    Craig McDonald

    -------------------------------1113791616
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
    <BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY:=
    Arial"=20
    bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dro=
    le_document=20
    face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
    <DIV>
    <DIV>In a message dated 4/17/05 6:55:04 AM Central Daylight Time,=20
    JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET writes:</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">=
    <FONT=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
    =3D2>I am=20
    becoming very weary with this arguing that is going on.  Please - ei=
    ther=20
    learn to use the software that is on your computer or choose some other h=
    obby=20
    like fishing or mountain climbing or rock hounding.  The Digital=20
    Millennium has yet to impact those hobbies as it has Numismatics.=20
    </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
    <DIV></DIV>
    <DIV>I think a lot of us are growing weary of this topic Jim, for various=20
    reasons.  I think by now it should be obvious to you and everyone, tha=
    t not=20
    all image processing software possesses the capabilities you think they=20
    do.  While various levels of computer proficiency certainly exist on t=
    his=20
    list, I believe that there are several members knowledgeable enough in=
    PCs,=20
    to prove beyond reasonable doubt that your assumptions are incorrect.</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>And if I may, I'd like to go back to square one, and ask you: EXA=
    CTLY=20
    why is this embedded information such a big deal?  Other than the fact=
    that=20
    the information CAN be included with an image (assuming the proper software=
    is=20
    available to view it), what VALUE does it bring to the table?  Is it j=
    ust a=20
    "nicety" or is there a true purpose for it?  If all it shows is who to=
    ok=20
    the image, and on what date, and what F ratio they used, and what exposure=
    =20
    length, and what the "x and y" pixel sizes are, and a copyright=20
    statement.....who cares?</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>Again, just because you CAN do something, does that mean you should?&n=
    bsp;=20
    Have you ever heard the joke about male dogs?  It's essentially the sa=
    me=20
    point.</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>Craig McDonald</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>

    -------------------------------1113791616--
Source URL Date published
  • 2005-04-17
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author