| Artikelinhalt |
- From rogermoore435@yahoo.com Fri Feb 03 09:32:19 2012
Return-Path: <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
X-Sender: rogermoore435@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 55286 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2012 17:32:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (98.137.35.160)
by m11.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2012 17:32:19 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO nm13-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.143)
by mta4.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2012 17:32:16 -0000
X-Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2012 17:32:16 -0000
X-Received: from [98.138.89.199] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2012 17:32:15 -0000
X-Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2012 17:32:15 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 448820.39956.bm@omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-Received: (qmail 75237 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Feb 2012 17:32:15 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 68oW8SEVM1mvplzcqOc_PAUVzYiNjPx5MW0dcAQ__yUSbkd
xrEEItCJu4B5mBxtgTJ1Pv5WCvJS0PpcSpz.0nHfeHGL2MGhZAp8DL1K.UWj
gkTcf1Z.fbdU2TdmA4IyJPGc4pvOUv002dcd0CfvGDkrVBp5ppCDNxeYZ8r0
h_gHUKg7anUSzwS3Y7N3TipKE0pF5meuIMaPXOSZNPBsIbNQDecfUrkqey7C
ngSArgbuTro7uPEpEP6RxTAa34ba1SKOBpR7tLD8xHg5AZeEGWsz2wp9kt5b
zY4R1unGgjVDRgxN5KXpMaV15aqXb4AW1DKKHSDqPp2hAG0nwWHFp7XnA_k3
wHmwe8GYJJJWdWmd4P2eKPEVmYh3T344ffKdIRHuzGUVonxUaEA3XAbaOCt1
GJd12VP72s09.QUlQAxqvzL7ms1t5nTAEPSFLn39VrDlq8W6Zh_zQwgi31IJ
VD8j8IJHK5d8-
X-Received: from [69.248.225.224] by web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:32:14 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537
Message-ID: <1328290334.36987.YahooMailNeo@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:32:14 -0800 (PST)
To: coins <nonregalresearch@yahoogroups.com>,
Colonial coins <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-1981468715-406929183-1328290334=:36987"
X-Originating-IP: 98.138.91.143
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:5:0:0:0
From: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
Subject: WHATSIT??
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=65078925; y=4CdkYJrtHCUg4d79EjFzzo1fiyrYQYGWCG9x3L-RJf9qZuhJ4bvcCg
X-Yahoo-Profile: rogermoore435
---1981468715-406929183-1328290334=:36987
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1981468715-1289163777-1328290334=:36987"
---1981468715-1289163777-1328290334=:36987
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello all,=A0 Since the super Bowl weekend is fast approaching and I find m=
yself unexpectedly free for the afternoon,=A0I have photographed some recen=
t purchases.=A0 The attached is one coin I am awed with.=A0 I know others h=
ave this same variety.=A0 The one I got is in virtually uncirculated condit=
ion.=A0 The issue is the date which is definitely 17 something something.=
=A0 I think others have labeled it as a 1762 which I have also done for the=
sake of discussion but I certainly could go with 1752, 1769, and1759.=A0 I=
usually don't like coins without good dates but this one is an exception.=
=A0 The crude hand cut legends and ridiculously hand cut date, reminds me a=
little of the Simians, but the strong well done obverse central device of =
King George II seems to contradict this, though the very crude Britannia su=
pports it.=A0 The coin needs more study but was wondering what others thoug=
ht were.=A0 Roger
---1981468715-1289163777-1328290334=:36987
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ar=
ial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:14pt"><div style=3D"RIGHT: auto">Hello=
all, Since the super Bowl weekend is fast approaching and I find mys=
elf unexpectedly free for the afternoon, I have photographed some rece=
nt purchases. The attached is one coin I am awed with. I know o=
thers have this same variety. The one I got is in virtually uncircula=
ted condition. The issue is the date which is definitely 17 something=
something. I think others have labeled it as a 1762 which I have als=
o done for the sake of discussion but I certainly could go with 1752, 1769,=
and1759. I usually don't like coins without good dates but this one =
is an exception. The crude hand cut legends and ridiculously hand cut=
date, reminds me a little of the Simians, but the strong well done obverse=
central device of King George II seems to contradict this, though the
very crude Britannia supports it. The coin needs more study but was =
wondering what others thought were<VAR id=3Dyui-ie-cursor></VAR>. Rog=
er</div></div></body></html>
---1981468715-1289163777-1328290334=:36987--
---1981468715-406929183-1328290334=:36987
Content-Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="6201RAM small.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="6201RAM small.jpg"
---1981468715-406929183-1328290334=:36987
Content-Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="6201RAM close up of date.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="6201RAM close up of date.jpg"
---1981468715-406929183-1328290334=:36987--
|
|---|
| Quell-URL |
|
|---|
| Veröffentlichungsdatum |
|
|---|
| Volumen |
|
|---|
