NUMISMATIST CHANGE Pubblico Deposited

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • The E-Sylum: Volume 6, Number 2, January 12, 2003, Article 11

    NUMISMATIST CHANGE

    Bruce Perdue writes: "I haven't read all of the "new" format
    "Numismatist", but it seems to me that some of this change was
    done for the advertisers ... their ads seem more intrusive than
    they did in the old format. I of course agree with Greg Heim
    that without David Bowers and Ken Bressett's columns it
    isn't as good as it was."

    Ken Bressett writes: "I must second what Greg Heim had to
    say about the new Numismatist. One can only hope that the
    extra effort and cost that went into the renovation is on target
    and of benefit to the typical ANA member. The decision to
    drop the columns by Dave Bowers and myself, as well as all
    the other changes, was strictly that of the ANA, and not ours."

    Regarding Greg's comment that "the articles were too
    specialized," Martin Purdy writes: "I find that rather odd, if I
    may say so. Put alongside a really academic and quite turgid
    publication such as the Numismatic Chronicle, which I have
    never succeeded in reading from cover to cover, the
    "Numismatist" is decidedly populist and lowbrow. Maybe
    that's not a good comparison, who knows.

    I enjoy receiving the "Numismatist" each month (I haven't
    got the January 03 issue yet, so I can't make an old/new
    comparison at this stage), but it's hardly a heavy read. It
    also tends to let some fairly basic errors through the
    editing process, which I wouldn't expect of a more
    academic publication."

    Bill Malkmus writes: "I noted the comments about the "new"
    Numismatist in last week's E-Sylum. I was compiling a list
    to send to the editor, and thought I'd offer a few of my
    comments.

    The dropping of the article I agree is a non-issue. But some
    of the other changes for the sake of change are not so
    innocuous. I have tried to resist my usual septuagenarian's
    viewpoint that equates "change" with "bad" (however often
    that may be the case).

    I do credit them for placing the name, date, and page number
    on (almost) every page. (It's frustrating when a Xerox file
    copy is found to be lacking in ID.)

    The typography and proofreading seem good, although I am
    still checking my pocket change unsuccessfully for that
    Eisenhower quarter mentioned on p.12.

    I agree that the dropping of Bowers and Bressett is regrettable,
    but would add Sear, Fitts, and Hessler (at least) to the list.

    But I cannot accept the premise that the former journal was
    too "erudite" or highbrow -- I don't go along with the "lowest
    common denominator" theory. I can't believe that vast
    numbers of readers could not cope with what David Sear had
    to offer in 2 or 3 pages on ancient coins. I do not collect dog
    tokens or beer tokens (and expect I never will), but I do not
    feel put upon for seeing articles about them; in fact, I feel my
    horizons are widened for having read them.

    In the "form overcoming content" category, I must remark on
    one of my pet peeves, that of overlapping photos of (usually)
    obverse and reverse images of a coin (the cute technical term
    being, I believe, "eclipsing") when, as is usually the case, there
    is no space constraint requiring it. I really get upset when what
    would be the best illustration I have of some particular coin is
    thus artsily mutilated, with partial obscuration of a reverse
    design or legend.

    The use of icons ("next page" and "end") is good, although the
    "end" icon should be at the very end of all text (after "learn
    more"). (I am not sure what the "end" icon represents, if it
    matters, and it is barely distinguishable from "next page.")

    Unfortunately, the introduction of the "learn more" caption
    seems to imply that there will never be any sufficiently
    important comment ever made which might require one of
    those untidy and intimidating footnotes or endnotes."

URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2003-01-12
Volume
  • 6

Le relazioni

Autore NNP