ON COPYRIGHT AND REIMBURSING AUTHORS Public Deposited

Article content
  • The E-Sylum: Volume 8, Number 5, January 30, 2005, Article 9

    ON COPYRIGHT AND REIMBURSING AUTHORS

    Jorg Lueke writes: "I wanted to comment on the L.A.Times
    story on Copyright law. In working on the Electronic
    Numismatist and some other related ideas for digitizing older
    works I've run into copyright issues time and again. Sure,
    anything before 1923 is clear sailing, but anything between
    then and 1963 you really need to research to make sure the
    copyright was not renewed. As these records are not all
    available online that can involve some cost or a trip to D.C.
    Works from 1964 are protected at least 70 years after the
    death of the author. Excessive or not, it is very difficult to
    track down the owners of the copyright even if you wanted
    to. Say a collector published a interesting treatise in 1964.
    Having passed away the copyright passed to his heirs, but
    how depends on what country and what state he/they reside
    in. Tracking the path can become horribly cumbersome.
    The end result is that this persons one published contribution
    becomes lost for fear of some lost claimant suing for a
    violation. While I am all for protecting author's rights I
    think
    after an initial term any extensions should at least be filed
    in
    a place that can be easily searched. Let the public have
    access to all those interesting but forgotten words as we
    enter the digital age of words. If anyone has any ideas on
    how such proposals might reach the ears of Congress, I'd
    be delighted to hear them."

    Ed Snible writes: "As a web-publisher of numismatic
    works that have lost copyright protection, I would like
    to respond to Mr. Mortensen. In E-Sylum v8#4,
    Morten Eske Mortensen writes:

    "Any copyright laws ought to include a paragraph
    'No title can lose the copyrighted status before the author
    has been paid the equivalent in royalties of a full salary
    for his work.'"

    The problem Mr. Mortensen writes about is real.
    Numismatic book buyers are apparently unwilling to
    purchase books at prices and in quantities sufficient
    to provide authors decent wages. Extending copyright
    will not help.

    Copyright law guarantees copyright for 70 years after the
    death of the author (or, in the case of older works, 95 years
    after publication). During this period the government provides
    free enforcement of a monopoly on printing the book. This
    protection is a pretty good deal for the author. Most small
    businesses fail; I know of no other industry that receives
    governmental protection even seven years after failure --
    let alone 70!

    For the past two years I've been scanning 19th and early
    20th century works on Greek coins for free use on the web.
    The long-dead authors receive no payment for the works
    I've web-published. Perhaps my contribution helps living
    authors? I hope the Digital Historia Numorum makes it
    easier for authors to research Greek coins. I also hope
    that the free availability of older works pushes book buyers
    to target their limited book-buying budget on new authors,
    rather than towards the reprint publishing houses.

    I would be curious to know the market value of publication
    rights to older numismatic works (1900-1950s, say). How
    much do Ares, Forni, Durst, University Microfilms, etc.
    pay to copyright holders for publication rights?"

Source URL Date published
  • 2005-01-30
Volume
  • 8

Relationships

NNP Author