WHAT MAKES A LIBRARY? Öffentlichkeit Deposited

Artikelinhalt
  • The E-Sylum: Volume 8, Number 29, July 10, 2005, Article 20

    WHAT MAKES A LIBRARY?

    Dave Kellogg writes: "I have many books on coins, but my
    collection may not qualify as a numismatic library. How do
    serious collectors describe a true library? Should books be
    contained within a single room, a single bookcase or set of
    cases? (Mine tend to move around the house as I peruse
    or study them according to current interests.) Should there
    be a catalog listing the library's contents? And what form
    should a catalog take - just a bibliography or a brief outline
    of each book's contents? Perhaps I am like many numismatists,
    probably purchasing books as my interest in specific coin
    types broadens. After years, a nice series of references builds
    up, but does that make it a "library"? Then there are the fringe
    topics, each important within its own classification, such as the
    classics, historical novels, biographies, etc. Are they legitimate
    portions of a numismatic library? Of course the answer is a
    library is what the owner makes it, but what is the general
    consensus, habit or convention of serious numismatic collectors?

    [I would say that to be called a library, a collection of literature
    must be organized in some fashion so that reference material
    can quickly be found. A catalog is nice, but optional, and so
    is having the library all in one room. I suppose there is some
    sort of minimum number of books required before you could
    call a collection of books a "library," but I have no idea where
    to draw the line. I have about 3,000 volumes shelved in and on
    about ten bookcases. But at one point I had just a shelf or two
    of numismatic books. At what point did it become a "library"?

    As for non-numismatic books, I shelf these alongside the
    numismatic books they relate to - a book on the Gold Rush
    would be shelved next to my books on private and pioneer gold,
    for example. I certainly consider these tangential works to be
    part of my library, but I recognize that others may not feel the
    same. If I were to sell my library I would catalog these right
    alongside the "proper" numismatic books, but they might be
    a tough sell in the numismatic literature market. As you say,
    to each their own.

    What do our readers think? -Editor]

Quell-URL Veröffentlichungsdatum
  • 2005-07-10
Volumen
  • 8

Beziehungen

NNP-Autor