C4 new group Publique Deposited

[C4] Re

Re

Contenu de l'article
  • From nrothschild1@home.com Sat May 27 12:34:44 2000
    Return-Path: <nrothschild1@home.com>
    Received: (qmail 7371 invoked from network); 27 May 2000 19:34:44 -0000
    Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 May 2000 19:34:44 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO mail.rdc1.md.home.com) (24.2.2.66) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 May 2000 19:34:44 -0000
    Received: from CC594346BB ([24.5.89.143]) by mail.rdc1.md.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP id <20000527193443.SCKN23916.mail.rdc1.md.home.com@CC594346BB> for <colonial-coins@egroups.com>; Sat, 27 May 2000 12:34:43 -0700
    Message-ID: <00e301bfc812$8a003860$8f590518@Domain>
    Reply-To: "Neil Rothschild" <nrothschild1@home.com>
    To: <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
    References: <db.4b1208d.266175fc@aol.com>
    Subject: Re: [C4] Re: C4 new group
    Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 15:32:46 -0400
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    From: "Neil Rothschild" <nrothschild1@home.com>

    Rob,

    Then I guess we agree......

    This issue has been brewing since the group was formed and there is a long
    audit trail of this in the archives. It has not been discussed here lately,
    but that does not mean the concerns of a large group of members has
    diminished. Your individual may have precipitated the decision, but it was
    a decision that needed to be made (a club only group).

    I can only assume Dennis has no plans to shut down this list. No one can
    prevent anyone from forming and joining another list. Besides, Dennis
    can't shut down this list. Only Bob Merchant can. And if the list was shut
    down, we can start up as many lists as we want. Therefore, the concept of a
    public list is, in the final analysis, outside the domain of C4. However,
    it would be possible for C4 to sponsor an open list as well as a closed
    list. I see pros and cons to that concept. So..... C4/Bob must make
    another decision- is this list to be shut down? Or turned over to some
    individual (or left with Bob)? Or run under the auspices of C4 as a public
    membership list? Remember, this is not truly a "public" list in the sense
    that it is universal property. Someone owns it and holds the "keys". Right
    now that is presumably Bob Merchant. Will he own the list? Suppose Bob
    gets tired of this coin stuff and quits. Who will take over? This isn't
    targeted at Bob per se, I'm just trying to convey the issues that could crop
    up over time.

    Neil


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <auctoricon@aol.com>
    To: <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
    Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 3:03 PM
    Subject: Re: [C4] Re: C4 new group


    > Neil,
    >
    > I really have to disagree with your interpretation of events. It was
    clearly
    > put to me that 'a couple of C4 Board members had complained about a
    > particular individual's posting to the group.' These, it appears, are the
    > only 'couple of members' who have sparked any actions whatsoever. All
    other
    > responses have supported and endorsed the continuation of open posting.
    If
    > anyone wishes to create a board for C4 members only, that is great. While
    it
    > was not directly stated as such, I, for one, certainly did get the
    > implication that there was an intent to close the present board and then
    open
    > a new one for C4 members only. As such, I felt compelled to stand up and
    > defend the very right to choice that you espouse.
    >
    > Rob
    >


URL source Date publiée
  • 2000-05-27
Volume
  • 1

Des relations

Auteur NNP