M.33.16-Z.15 die state Public Deposited

Re

Article content
  • From sstephens@hsc.wvu.edu Mon Jun 19 12:25:43 2000
    Return-Path: <sstephens@hsc.wvu.edu>
    Received: (qmail 1395 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 19:25:43 -0000
    Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 19 Jun 2000 19:25:43 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO mo.egroups.com) (10.1.1.34) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Jun 2000 19:25:43 -0000
    X-eGroups-Return: sstephens@hsc.wvu.edu
    Received: from [10.1.10.68] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 19 Jun 2000 19:25:44 -0000
    Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:25:41 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
    Subject: Re: M.33.16-Z.15 die state
    Message-ID: <8ils3l+sv98@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <394E72C6.D4B391D7@EarthLink.net>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 4047
    X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
    From: "Stan Stephens" <sstephens@hsc.wvu.edu>

    Jim,
    You never cease to amaze me.
    Stan




    --- In colonial-coins@egroups.com, LWS/JCS/CNLF <JCSpilman@E...>
    wrote:
    > Neil & Stan - -
    >
    > This sort of die break DOES occur - usually when a die would have
    > "warped" a bit but instead had a catastrophic fracture so that the
    warp
    > did not remain but the fields move in height relative to one
    another.
    > This is due to uneven hardening in the base of the die. Big problem
    > with the early U.S.Mint.
    >
    > I once upon a time wrote a short paper on the subject with
    illustrations
    > but I never did get around to publishing it. It is titled Numismatic
    > Tectonics. If I can locate it in my files I will send you both a
    copy.
    >
    > Jim/CNLF
    >
    > =====================
    >
    > Neil Rothschild wrote:
    > >
    > > Stan,
    > >
    > > I think you are saying that the fields on either side of the
    "break"
    > > are on
    > > different planes? I don't recall noticing that on my specimen
    but
    I
    > > know it
    > > is this later state.
    > >
    > > I've attached a scanned image (not a digital photo), ex Bowers
    7/7/96
    > > Long
    > > sale:316. What you are describing would be tough to ascertain on
    a
    > > 2-D
    > > image. The Perkins coin happened to be an early state but that
    may
    > > be
    > > unusual for the variety. I did a quick check of my plates last
    night
    > > and
    > > saw the break on most specimens, at least to some extent.
    > >
    > > I also attached a half tone photo of my 33.2-Z.17. I call this
    the
    > > "San
    > > Andreas Fault Variety". You can see from the shadowing that the
    > > fields on
    > > either side of the break are on distinctly different planes.
    It's
    one
    > > of my
    > > favorite die breaks. This break bisects the coin from rim to
    rim.
    I
    > > think
    > > what you see as unusual with the 33.16-Z.15 is that the break is
    tiny
    > > and
    > > should not have resulted in differing altitudes of the fields??
    > >
    > > Also attached a 3rd photo of a 33.16_Z.15 that I digitally
    > > photographed from
    > > a dealer stock box recently. This appears to a slightly earlier
    state
    > > than
    > > the Long piece, but the photo is very high res. You can blow it
    up
    > > and
    > > compare to your (?) coin.
    > >
    > > Neil
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Stan Stephens <sstephens@h...>
    > > To: <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
    > > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 2:15 PM
    > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] M.33.16-Z.15 die state
    > >
    > > > Neil,
    > > > I meant to post a scan of the coin today but I walked out of the
    > > > house this morning without it.
    > > >
    > > > It is not a raised line resulting from a die break at K5 on the
    > > > obverse. The surface below the line is higher than the surface
    above
    > > > it. Detail on either side does not seem to suffer.
    > > > Looking at Perkins lot 380 I see no signs of this and this just
    > > seems
    > > > a curious thing to me.
    > > >
    > > > Thanks Jim for the feedback on the Fugio. I will check CNL
    tonight.
    > > > Stan
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    > > > Act NOW before June 30 to win $5,000!
    > > > Start grading businesses in your area to win.
    > > > http://click.egroups.com/1/5524/8/_/_/_/961438657/
    > > >
    > >
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    > >
    > > Name: 33_2_Z_17.jpg
    > > 33_2_Z_17.jpg Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
    > > Encoding: base64
    > >
    > > Name: 33_16_Z_15.JPG
    > > 33_16_Z_15.JPG Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
    > > Encoding: base64
    > >
    > > Name: 352_0024.jpg
    > > 352_0024.jpg Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
    > > Encoding: base64

Source URL Date published
  • 2000-06-19
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author