U.S. Code... Public Deposited
- From bkweston@netzero.net Mon Jul 17 09:12:41 2000
Return-Path: <bkweston@netzero.net>
Received: (qmail 25044 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 16:12:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Jul 2000 16:12:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail7.wlv.netzero.net) (209.247.163.57) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 16:12:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 23669 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 16:12:37 -0000
Received: from pppa58-resalestatecollege1-1r7152.saturn.bbn.com (HELO computer) (4.54.48.119) by mail7.wlv.netzero.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 16:12:37 -0000
Message-ID: <000a01bff023$9300fba0$a5b7fea9@computer>
To: <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
Subject: U.S. Code...
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:16:48 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFEFE8.E1DA6260"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@netzero.net>
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFEFE8.E1DA6260
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Boy you're quick on the trigger, Dan!
I have several of those vintage '60's copies around, but I think could =
"reasonably" date them to this era. I've also noticed that quite a few =
of them have done rather well on ebay, usually with the seller claiming =
ingnorance, which I find interesting in itself. I don't know how you =
might prove the date of manufacture otherwise, unless the Feds think =
they can?!
Byron
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFEFE8.E1DA6260
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" http-equiv=3DContent-Type=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Boy you're quick on the trigger, Dan!</FON=
T></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have several of those vintage '60's copi=
es=20
around, but I think could "reasonably" date them to this era. I've also not=
iced=20
that quite a few of them have done rather well on ebay, usually with the se=
ller=20
claiming ingnorance, which I find interesting in itself. I don't know how y=
ou=20
might prove the date of manufacture otherwise, unless the Feds think they=20
can?!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Byron</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFEFE8.E1DA6260-- - 2000-07-17
- 1
