Your opinion on NJ rarities R1-R4 Public Deposited
- From wierzba@shore.net Mon Aug 14 18:27:59 2000
Return-Path: <wierzba@shore.net>
Received: (qmail 3067 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2000 01:27:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 15 Aug 2000 01:27:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mo.egroups.com) (10.1.1.34) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2000 01:27:59 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: wierzba@shore.net
Received: from [10.1.10.108] by mo.egroups.com with NNFMP; 15 Aug 2000 01:27:59 -0000
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 01:27:54 -0000
To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
Subject: Your opinion on NJ rarities R1-R4
Message-ID: <8na6aq+1cid@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 727
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 209.192.169.159
From: wierzba@shore.net
First, forgive the copy and paste spacing from excel. Can I get
opinions from NJ collectors if the rarities listed below seem right
or should be revised. This is a work in progress that has made some
changes from traditional rarities. Think of these as rarity clusters
that seem to belong together.
6 - D 1
14 - J 1
16 - L 1
32 - T 1
43 - d 1
46 - e 1
48 - g 1
56 - n 1
62 - q 1
63 - q 1
63 - s 1
64 - t 1
67 - v 1
17 - b 2
18 - M 2
23 - P 2
23 - R 2
24 - P 2
39 - a 2
77 - dd 2
17 - K 3
21 - N 3
28 - L 3
31 - L 3
34 - J 3
38 - c 3
54 - k 3
65 - u 3
6 - C 4
15 - J 4
15 - L 4
15 - T 4
29 - L 4
30 - L 4
33 - U 4
37 - f 4
38 - Y 4
43 - Y 4
44 - d 4
48 - f 4
50 - f 4
52 - i 4
53 - j 4
55 - m 4
60 - p 4
75 - bb 4
- 2000-08-14
- 1
