c/s Anton 2 Öffentlichkeit Deposited
Re
- From wierzba@mediaone.net Mon Oct 16 17:45:17 2000
Return-Path: <wierzba@mediaone.net>
X-Sender: wierzba@mediaone.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 17 Oct 2000 00:45:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 5276 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2000 00:45:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Oct 2000 00:45:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ej.egroups.com) (10.1.10.49) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2000 00:45:17 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: wierzba@mediaone.net
Received: from [10.1.2.4] by ej.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Oct 2000 00:45:23 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:45:15 -0000
To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
Subject: Re: c/s Anton 2
Message-ID: <8sg7er+upfp@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <009901c037b1$5c4ad100$a737d38d@saagwf5b.saa.lsa.umich.edu>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1218
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 24.128.190.210
From: wierzba@mediaone.net
Dan,
I enjoyed your CW article on c/fs.
--- In colonial-coins@egroups.com, "Dan Freidus" <freidus@w...> wrote:
> What I find most helpful is to figure out what direction the light
came from
> by looking for highlights on sections that you know are raised. If
the
> counterstamp shows highlights on the same side, it's also raised,
if it
> shows shadows on that side, it's incuse. Our eyes assume that the
light
> comes from above so it can play tricks with you if it comes from
below.
>
> Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Byron <bkweston@n...>
> To: colonial-coins@egroups.com <colonial-coins@egroups.com>
> Date: Monday, October 16, 2000 4:18 PM
> Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: c/s Anton 2
>
>
> >--- In colonial-coins@egroups.com, LWS/JCS/CNLF <JCSpilman@E...>
> >wrote:
> >> Byron - -
> >>
> >> It appears the the c/s lettering on Anton 2 is incuse (into the
> >coin)
> >> while the c/s lettering on the prior specimen is raised. Is this
> >> correct?
> >
> >Yes, Jim, that is correct...
> >
> > I cannot tell for certain from the photos.
> >
> >Yes, photos can be illusional at times! Perhaps we should go to
> >holographic three dimensional images?!...Byron
> >>
> >> Jim/CNLF - 2000-10-16
- 1
