info please... Público Deposited

Re

Conteúdo do artigo
  • From bkweston@netzero.net Sun Jan 21 20:09:35 2001
    Return-Path: <bkweston@netzero.net>
    X-Sender: bkweston@netzero.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_1_2); 22 Jan 2001 04:09:33 -0000
    Received: (qmail 89458 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 04:09:31 -0000
    Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Jan 2001 04:09:31 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO ef.egroups.com) (10.1.2.111) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2001 04:09:31 -0000
    X-eGroups-Return: bkweston@netzero.net
    Received: from [10.1.10.132] by ef.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2001 04:09:25 -0000
    Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 04:08:51 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
    Subject: Re: info please...
    Message-ID: <94gboj+68he@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <94g2bi+99uo@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 1153
    X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
    X-Originating-IP: 4.54.48.80
    From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@netzero.net>

    Ed: Thanks for the rarity rating update.
    Marc: Ask and ye shall receive.










    --- In colonial-coins@egroups.com, "Marc Mayhugh" <marc1@k...> wrote:
    > ---
    > I wasn't even smart enough to ask for an obverse scan. I thought
    > about bidding but passed figuring it was an 19.Glad you guys had
    some
    > fun this afternoon. It would of been interesting to see how it
    would
    > have went if there had been an obverse posted.
    >
    > Marc
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > In colonial-coins@egroups.com, "Byron Weston" <bkweston@n...>
    > wrote:
    > > Thanks Jim and Ed. The bow gave it away for me but I was still
    not
    > certain as I did not have an image immediately at hand, but it did
    > not
    > match any of the others, so I figured it had to be 20. Luckily the
    > consigner was kind enough to send me an obverse image - he put only
    > the reverse with the lot description - or I would have simply
    passed
    > it off as a more common variety with the 87C reverse. I did get a
    > second opinion to confirm my suspicions. Tom's variety listings
    says
    > R-8 but I've heard that there are at least 5 others known. What
    does
    > your statistical info say Ed? Byron

URL da fonte Data de publicação
  • 2001-01-21
Volume
  • 1

Relacionamentos

Autor do PNN