Why counterfeit Irish farthings? Pubblico Deposited

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From jmkleeberg@yahoo.com Sat Feb 17 16:25:57 2001
    Return-Path: <jmkleeberg@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: jmkleeberg@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 18 Feb 2001 00:25:56 -0000
    Received: (qmail 82516 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2001 00:25:56 -0000
    Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Feb 2001 00:25:56 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web3405.mail.yahoo.com) (204.71.203.59) by mta3 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2001 01:27:01 -0000
    Message-ID: <20010218002556.22653.qmail@web3405.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [128.122.253.144] by web3405.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:25:56 PST
    Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:25:56 -0800 (PST)
    Subject: Why counterfeit Irish farthings?
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    From: John Kleeberg <jmkleeberg@yahoo.com>

    Counterfeiting a farthing was a lot of work for
    comparatively little return, and that applies all the
    more to Irish farthings, but if it was worthwhile to
    counterfeit Irish halfpence, it was worthwhile to
    counterfeit Irish farthings. One interesting
    phenomenon I noticed is that as the quality of the low
    denomination circulation medium in the British isles
    and North America deteriorated, the British/Irish
    differential collapsed, so that the British and the
    Irish pieces mingled in circulation. Irish coppers
    even circulated to a small extent on the British
    mainland - hoard evidence shows this. I discussed
    this in my article on the Faithful Steward, which is
    in the COAC on Coinage of the Confederation Period
    that Phil Mossman edited.

    Now, did farthings circulate in the North American
    plantations? We had a discussion about this in the
    CNL a few years ago. My feeling is - up through the
    reign of George II, yes, certainly, we can prove it
    through hoard evidence, although they never composed a
    large proportion of the coins in circulation. George
    III - not certain, hoard evidence is lacking, but my
    feeling is yes, given that the Massachusetts mint and
    the US Mint later decided that there was a need for
    that type of denomination (the half cent). Of course,
    the half cent also served another purpose - it helped
    smooth out the rough edges between the Federal decimal
    coins and the Spanish-American octal system (12 1/2
    cents).

    It is interesting that the Irish pieces that Byron
    showed were both from George II.

    John Kleeberg
    jmkleeberg@yahoo.com

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
    a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2001-02-17
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP