| Contenu de l'article |
- From JCSpilman@EarthLink.net Sun Aug 19 15:24:44 2001
Return-Path: <JCSpilman@EarthLink.net>
X-Sender: JCSpilman@EarthLink.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 19 Aug 2001 22:24:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 98410 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 22:24:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 19 Aug 2001 22:24:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net) (207.217.121.12)
by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 22:24:43 -0000
Received: from EarthLink.net (user-2injov5.dialup.mindspring.com [165.121.227.229])
by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21416;
Sun, 19 Aug 2001 15:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B803CA8.5411D84F@EarthLink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:24:39 -0500
Reply-To: JCSpilman@EarthLink.net
Organization: HOME
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Va 1/2 d
References: <9lnbd2+ldv6@eGroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Spilman <JCSpilman@EarthLink.net>
IMHO the photo is not adequate to make that sort of determination.
"Morris E. Hankins" wrote:
> Jim
>
> Not to add to the confusion but does it look like GEORGIVS could
> possibly have been double struck ?
>
> Or is it my imagination of seeing an underlying V S I G and R ?
>
> Morris
>
> --- In colonial-coins@y..., James Spilman <JCSpilman@E...> wrote:
> > Morris, et al - -
> >
> > Now look at it after severe processing via. PhotoShop.
> >
> > Very low period after S - Possibly Newman 18 -?-
> >
> > Jim/CNLF
> >
> > ==================================
> >
> > "Morris E. Hankins" wrote:
> >
> > > Alan, do appreciate your trying to help on this. But have had it
> > > under microscope, 3x, 5x, 10x, 20x etc. There is no period after
> REX.
> > >
> > > On the reverse, same problem, no stop after date, no stop after
> NIA
> > > either.
> > >
> > > Anybody have any ideas or possible suggestions on where to go or
> what
> > > to do next on this.
> > >
> > > Maybe, I just should just call it a contemporary counterfeit and
> be
> > > done with it. Or, maybe send it in to Bowers and let the experts
> > > pick it apart.
> > >
> > > Hey Bryon, I just called it a contemporary counterfeit....does
> that
> > > mean I'll get help on this? Does sort of look like a Simian Sub-
> > > Evasion with a Regal twist.
> > >
> > > Signed
> > >
> > > Frenzied and Paranoid Morris
> > >
> > > --- In colonial-coins@y..., vacoinage@a... wrote:
> > > > Morris:
> > > > The next time you have the coin in hand try 6X with the
> period
> > > after REX
> > > > just a shadow because of a clogged die.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Alan
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|---|
| URL source |
|
|---|
| Date publiée |
|
|---|
| Volume |
|
|---|
