controversial 1771 ctft on eBay 上市 Deposited
new correspondence re
Re
- From bkweston@netzero.net Sun Sep 02 07:23:00 2001
Return-Path: <bkweston@netzero.net>
X-Sender: bkweston@netzero.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 2 Sep 2001 14:23:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 57063 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2001 14:23:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2001 14:23:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n24.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.111)
by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2001 14:23:00 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: bkweston@netzero.net
Received: from [10.1.4.77] by ef.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 Sep 2001 14:23:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 14:22:55 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: new correspondence re: controversial 1771 ctft on eBay
Message-ID: <9mtfbv+f7j7@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <131.10052ef.28c35fa9@aol.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1771
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 4.54.48.151
From: "Byron K. Weston" <bkweston@netzero.net>
I think that I can understand Pete's position, sort of like a
Supervisor stuck between middle management and the employees -
the "monkey in the middle" position!
NHF!
Byron
--- In colonial-coins@y..., PowerFlame@a... wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I received this e-mail from Pete of JMG NUM@a..., the seller
of that
> very controversial counterfeit 1771 halfpenny on eBay -- the one
that was
> pulled off of eBay. It's dated August 20, and I received it while I
was on
> vacation in Italy...but here it is, for those who are interested.
>
> Eric Cheung
> ericlc@s...
>
> <<Subj: Re: 1771 Coin
> Date: 8/20/01 9:20:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> From: <A HREF="mailto:JGM NUM">JGM NUM</A>
> To: <A HREF="mailto:PowerFlame">PowerFlame</A>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I know that you have been sharing my eMails to you w/the collecting
> community, so please share THIS:
> I work here; I do not own the company.
> The coin belonged to the Company, and was not mine to do with as I
wished.
> I am very sorry if this has created any hard feelings with Bidders
&
> Prospective Bidders-this was not the intention that I had-the coin
was
> expected to run the full course of the auction.
> If there are those who will not bid on any of our other offerings
because of
> this situation, well, I am sorry that you may miss some neat things.
> I do not appreciate the personal attacks levied on me by some
correspondents.
> There was nothing "personal" directed at anyone regarding the
ending of the
> auction. We didn't know what it was when it was purchased, and
didn't know
> what it was when the auction was canceled. Perhaps that would have
made a
> difference when the decision was made; I don't know and it's of no
use
> speculating about it now.>> - 2001-09-02
- 1
