Questionable 1776 Machins Mills? Público Deposited
[Colonial Numismatics] Re
Re
- From PowerFlame@aol.com Tue Sep 04 19:07:15 2001
Return-Path: <PowerFlame@aol.com>
X-Sender: PowerFlame@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 5 Sep 2001 02:07:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 66089 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 02:07:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Sep 2001 02:07:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r07.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.103)
by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 02:07:12 -0000
Received: from PowerFlame@aol.com
by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.fd.b987eda (2617)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:07:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <fd.b987eda.28c6e2cd@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:07:09 EDT
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Questionable 1776 Machins Mills?
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 106
From: PowerFlame@aol.com
In a message dated 9/4/2001 9:40:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
madcoins@earthlink.net writes:
> Yeah - the seller sent me an email saying he'd been told it was not a real
> Machins. It was a nice coin though! The numerals in the date were too close
> together to have been a Machins.
> Tom
The bust was wrong, too!
Eric - 2001-09-04
- 1
