long digests 上市 Deposited
- From palmers4@erols.com Fri Dec 21 18:13:37 2001
Return-Path: <palmers4@erols.com>
X-Sender: palmers4@erols.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 22 Dec 2001 02:13:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 41808 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2001 02:13:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2001 02:13:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n28.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.78)
by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2001 02:13:36 -0000
Received: from [216.115.96.155] by n28.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2001 02:13:36 -0000
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 02:13:32 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: long digests
Message-ID: <a00q8c+fgim@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 655
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "dp1787" <palmers4@erols.com>
X-Originating-IP: 209.122.226.186
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=35383343
X-Yahoo-Profile: dp1787
I have to agree with Bob on this. Some of the threads are
unbelievably long. It makes it easier on the site to go to a message
of interest and read all posts that pertain to it, but when the daily
digest arrives, it makes for a lengthy process of wading thru the
original messages to get to the one or two line replies.
I decided to post this separately, instead of reply to either Bob or
Byron's messages. I expect that Byron is also right in that the site
works a certain way and there is nothing we can do about that. I do
try to remove the unimportant parts of the messages I reply to, as I
did tonight with my reply to Syd and to Tom. David - 2001-12-21
- 1
