Re 上市 Deposited
EAC Catalog
- From CMcdon0923@aol.com Thu Mar 28 13:01:16 2002
Return-Path: <CMcdon0923@aol.com>
X-Sender: CMcdon0923@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 28 Mar 2002 21:01:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 70714 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 21:01:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2002 21:01:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.89)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 21:01:15 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.137] by n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Mar 2002 21:01:15 -0000
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:01:14 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: EAC Catalog
Message-ID: <a800aq+692o@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <01c701c1d687$8edf1c40$8179be18@default>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 585
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "cmcdon0923" <CMcdon0923@aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: 199.228.142.8
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2446688
X-Yahoo-Profile: cmcdon0923
I received mine yesterday....and I agree, another superb job by M&G
(although they need more Colonials....oh wait, that's what the C4
catalog is for...never mind).
After looking at the whole sale, how anyone could even possibly
suggest that the past two EAC catalogs have not brought forth a
better "class" of material for the sale, is beyond me. Anyone who
would suggest that EAC revert back to the old format catalogs is
crazy.
(The preceeding was a personal opinion, and in no way reflects the
opinion of C4, or anyone who knows what's going on, for that matter.)
Craig - 2002-03-28
- 1
