[Colonial Numismatics] Open question Öffentlichkeit Deposited

Re

Artikelinhalt
  • From palmers4@erols.com Wed Apr 17 20:14:13 2002
    Return-Path: <palmers4@erols.com>
    X-Sender: palmers4@erols.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 18 Apr 2002 03:14:13 -0000
    Received: (qmail 32487 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 03:11:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2002 03:11:36 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.71)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 03:11:35 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.67.185] by n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2002 03:08:55 -0000
    Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 03:08:50 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Open question
    Message-ID: <a9ldc2+p290@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <010701c1e630$8f97e640$d2039618@scwe2.on.cogeco.ca>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 1206
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    From: "dp1787" <palmers4@erols.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 24.186.173.66
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=35383343
    X-Yahoo-Profile: dp1787

    --- In colonial-coins@y..., "Gord Nichols" <gnichols@c...> wrote:
    > David
    > I haven't checked but that "checkout" has confused things.
    Used to be both the buyer and seller were responsible to make
    contact within 3 business days. As "tokeng" I always send emails
    outlining all but also leave instructions for people in a hurry with
    the checkout so they can go that route. If they email me through the
    checkout asking for instructions I just email them as I would
    regularly. I don't know the rules about checkout.
    >
    > If you ask safeharbour you may converse with an intelligent
    person or an automaton. If you get the latter just write back a day
    or 2 later. Maybe checkout overides the seller's responsibilty (if
    no address is left????) to email the high bidder. If you find out
    any non contradictory rules on this please share them. I'm certain
    most of us will be very interested.
    >
    > One thing is for certain though that overides any logical set
    of rules. NO MATTER WHAT THE RULES AND WHO BREAKS THEM YOU CAN
    ALWAYS GET A NEGATIVE FROM A JERK. So "caveat emptor" remains the #1
    rule.
    > Best of luck
    >

    Gord, Thanks for the reply. I will check it out with safeharbor.
    David


Quell-URL Veröffentlichungsdatum
  • 2002-04-17
Volumen
  • 1

Beziehungen

NNP-Autor