who made CARE Público Deposited
Re
- From mhodder@theworld.com Sun Apr 28 07:54:19 2002
Return-Path: <mhodder@theworld.com>
X-Sender: mhodder@theworld.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 28 Apr 2002 14:54:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 24558 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.72)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.141] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0000
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 14:54:15 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: who made CARE
Message-ID: <aah2en+siqs@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CCBF589.4214C041@worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 770
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "mike468hodder" <mhodder@theworld.com>
X-Originating-IP: 67.242.199.62
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=93877054
X-Yahoo-Profile: mike468hodder
A quick (and definitely superficial) web search suggests that the
1,1,1-Trichloriethane in my bottle of Blue Ribbon and the
1,1,1-Trichloroethane im my bottle of CARE are one and the same
chemical, whose use is as a metal degreaser. How this can be
following the EPA's restriction of its manufacture except for
essential uses is curious (is copper coin maintenance an essential
use?). Anyway, I suspect that the real difference between CARE and
Blue Ribbon lies in the composition of the "thin film of silicones"
left behind by CARE vs. the "lubricant" deposited by Blue Ribbon.
I just noticed that CARE comes in a light reduced bottle whereas
Brand X is in a clear glass bottle. I wonder why?
Mike H
PS. The original price of my bottle of CARE was $1.35. - 2002-04-28
- 1
