| 文章內容 |
- From njraywms@optonline.net Wed May 15 05:59:21 2002
Return-Path: <njraywms@optonline.net>
X-Sender: njraywms@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 15 May 2002 12:59:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 2701 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 12:59:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2002 12:59:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.5.133)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 12:59:21 -0000
Received: from DIANEJ33YVI95P (ool-18bc7750.dyn.optonline.net [24.188.119.80])
by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000))
with SMTP id <0GW500H3FLD1EL@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:00:43 -0400
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Ct Copper help
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <002901c1fc10$85c26370$f2fea8c0@DIANEJ33YVI95P>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <110.1237ac97.2a133560@aol.com>
From: Ray Williams <njraywms@optonline.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=78843690
X-Yahoo-Profile: njray2
Hi Jeff!
I only use the chart in the Durst reprint to determine the obverse and
reverse types, then I go after the pictures. The Perkins catalog was at
hand at the time. I came up with the reverse type as a "T" family from the
chart, not the "s" family. That's where I was thrown off. I rarely see
CT's and find them much more challenging to attribute than NJ's. Thanks for
the suggestion...
Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: <Rosaamltd@aol.com>
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Ct Copper help
> Hi Ray -- want an easier way than using the Durst piece of crap? I find
it
> MUCH easier to figure out what the general obverse type is -- in this case
a
> 33, given the cinquefoils on that side, and then just plow through the
Taylor
> catalogue, comparing that obverse die to each of the dies in the 33 family
> (Taylor didn't have them all, but he had most, generally in high grade, so
> it's pretty easy to find a match). Then flip the coin over and worry
about
> the reverse. Of course, if either side has any distinct die breaks or has
> anything really out of the ordinary, it makes the job a lot easier!
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
|
|---|
| 來源網址 |
|
|---|
| 發布日期 |
|
|---|
| 體積 |
|
|---|
