[Colonial Numismatics] Re 上市 Deposited

Ct Copper help

Re

文章內容
  • From joshalso2000@yahoo.com Thu May 16 15:42:15 2002
    Return-Path: <joshalso2000@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: joshalso2000@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 16 May 2002 22:42:15 -0000
    Received: (qmail 46193 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 22:42:13 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 May 2002 22:42:13 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web14202.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.172.144)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2002 22:42:12 -0000
    Message-ID: <20020516224212.85203.qmail@web14202.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [152.163.206.211] by web14202.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2002 15:42:12 PDT
    Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 15:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Ct Copper help
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: <ac0o7p+73cr@eGroups.com>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    From: Morris Hankins <joshalso2000@yahoo.com>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=75343914
    X-Yahoo-Profile: joshalso2000

    Neil - superb set of tips even for the "experts".

    Would love for your to expand on Tip #10 specifically
    the thirty varieties that make up the 98%.

    I am sure that a lot of people are giving thanks for
    these tips.

    Morris


    --- nrothschild1 <nrothschild@comcast.net> wrote:
    > Ray,
    >
    > What threw you off? Your reverse has a clear hyphen
    > between ET and
    > LIB.
    >
    > The punctuation (hyphens/dots/etc) between ET and
    > LIB are critical
    > for CT attributions. More problematic for worn
    > specimens (unlike
    > yours, which is very nice).
    >
    > Here are a few tips that help me:
    >
    > 1) If the obverse is 33, start with the reverse. I
    > usually do the
    > reverse first anyway, but that is a personal
    > preference.
    >
    > 2) If worn, assume punctuation may be missing, so
    > make a list of
    > anything that COULD be your coin- if your coin has
    > one cinquefoil
    > after INDE, the actual die might have two, with one
    > missing. Same
    > with the ET-LIB punctuation and ETLIB/ETLIR. With
    > a little practice
    > you can tell if the coin is worn enough to miss a
    > device. This may
    > not eliminate much, but it's better than looking at
    > everything.
    >
    > 3) I also always start with the Miller type list,
    > as you did.
    >
    > 4) As mentioned, die breaks are critical. s.1, for
    > instance is
    > always broken to the left of the face to the rim.
    > It's a dead ringer
    > if you spend a few thousand hours with he series <s>
    >
    > 5) Study the space between ET and LIB VERY
    > CAREFULLY. If there is
    > ANYTHING disturbing the field, assume it is
    > punctuation and try to
    > find something that fits. Some of the hyphens will
    > look like dots,
    > so don't take Miller too literally. There is not
    > much difference
    > between a short hyphen and a dot, especially if
    > there is a weak
    > strike or wear or other disturbances in the field.
    >
    > 6) Learn the difference between Jarvis letters and
    > original Company
    > of Coining Coppers letters. The Jarvis letters are
    > smaller and
    > distinctive. That immediately narrows the search if
    > you know which
    > types are from each mint. Obverses 16-29 are
    > generally CCC, 32, 33
    > are Jarvis. Look at Taylor and you should see the
    > difference.
    > Jarvis letters are the same as Fugios. Of course,
    > Jarvis used
    > cinquefoils and CCC did not....
    >
    > 7) There are ETLIB and ETLIR legends. Each ETLIR
    > usually has a
    > sister type with ETLIB, all else is the same. There
    > is a continuum
    > between a fully formed B and a fully formed R. A
    > fully formed B and
    > a fully formed R is usually obvious, but there are
    > some dies that I
    > think (IMHO) could be classed as ETLIB or ETLIR. So
    > if still
    > stumped, check the ETLIRs if you assumed ETLIB, etc.
    > In the case of
    > certain ETLIBs, the bottom crossbar of the B is very
    > delicate and in
    > VG or lower grade, can be easily missed or
    > completely missing. So if
    > you think it is an ETLIR, and it is low grade,
    > always check the
    > sister ETLIB type if you can't find an ETLIR to
    > match. I have seen
    > ETLIR's that I think should have been classed as
    > ETLIB, but I suspect
    > Miller might not have seen a high enough grade to
    > see the delicate
    > crossbar.
    >
    > 8) For 1786, forget it. These were all hubbed and
    > it's like doing
    > Morgan VAM varieties. Very diffcult unless the coin
    > is high grade
    > and well struck.
    >
    > 9) For 1787 reverses the BRANCH is the key,
    > especially for Z
    > reverses. It is almost always well struck and wears
    > well. Every
    > branch on every die is unique, as they were all
    > constructed with tiny
    > punches. Same for 1786, by the way. Same for every
    > CT die, for that
    > matter.
    >
    > 10) 98% of unattributed 1787 CT's are one of maybe
    > 30 varieties.
    > And most unattributed Ct's are 1787. When I am
    > doing tough types,
    > like 33 and/or Z, I search in rarity sequence (but I
    > do it with a
    > computer.. tougher by hand).
    >
    > 11) If you want to spend more time than you really
    > want to put into
    > this (since it is not one of your specialties) you
    > could do this
    >
    > a. Get your Taylor, EAC 75, Perkins, Oechsner,
    > Hessberg, Stacks
    > 6/94, maybe a few others.... together.
    >
    > b) Decide which has the best overall photos
    > for attibution-
    > Taylor or Perkins. Most people prefer Taylor since
    > he had more high
    > cencus pieces. That is your "master" guide.
    >
    > c) Look at each variety in (Taylor/Perkins,
    > the master catalog)
    > and where the variety is weak or difficult to use,
    > check the other
    > catalogs. If there is a better specimen in one of
    > the other sales,
    > make a note in your master catalog (i.e. "EAC 75:999
    > is best pix").
    >
    > 12. Re-read tip #9. It is THE KEY.
    >
    > 13) Upload photo to this group. It worked the last
    > time you tried!
    >
    > Hope this helps a little....
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --- In colonial-coins@y..., Ray Williams
    > <njraywms@o...> wrote:
    > > Could any of you CT guys out there help me
    > with attribution? I
    > was thinking this is a 33 obverse and a T reverse
    > but I'm having
    > difficulty matching it. I just got this off ebay
    > from Don V as a Red
    > Book type coin.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > Ray
    >
    >
    > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    >
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >


    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
    http://launch.yahoo.com
來源網址 發布日期
  • 2002-05-16
體積
  • 1

人际关系

NNP作者