Re Público Deposited
Response to Byron
- From bkweston@lazerlink.com Wed May 22 09:05:46 2002
Return-Path: <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Sender: bkweston@lazerlink.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 22 May 2002 16:05:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 34108 invoked from network); 22 May 2002 16:05:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 May 2002 16:05:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.65)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 May 2002 16:05:45 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.174] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2002 16:05:41 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:05:39 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Response to Byron
Message-ID: <acgfkj+cj18@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <acge5e+kfft@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1310
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "bkweston" <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Originating-IP: 199.234.152.110
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90999161
X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston
--- In colonial-coins@y..., "njcopperjohn" <jlorenzo@o...> wrote:
> That is why we need a data base of variety classifications and
> metallurgical results for each family of counterfeit to study
> individual homogenous metal signatures, coupling this with the
> historical knowledge presently known, then couple this with
geography
> and geology (probably 100 years from now) and then maybe a
provenance
> will come about from our efforts that our grandchildren can
> appreciate.
>
> JPL.
Well, I suppose that's fine and dandy, John, but in the case of the
Simian style counterfeits (British and Irish) with the 'spidery
letters' we already know that they die link with 3 Evasions (4 if you
count A-96) as well several Generic style obverses and reverses.
I don't think that indicates American/British mules and doubt if my
grandchildren will ever have to wonder about those.
I agree that all inclusive analyses would have some benefit, perhaps,
but likely nothing earthshaking in as far as determining provenance.
I can't say that I see anything wrong with pursuing such an all
inclusive study, but I can't see any short or long term benefits that
might change my mind about certain things that I've already accepted
as fact. I would, however, appreciate your effort in the pursuit.
Byron - 2002-05-22
- 1
