Weston Again 上市 Deposited
- From jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com Wed May 22 11:36:56 2002
Return-Path: <jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com>
X-Sender: jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 22 May 2002 18:36:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 91536 invoked from network); 22 May 2002 18:36:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 May 2002 18:36:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.81)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 May 2002 18:36:55 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.175] by n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2002 18:36:54 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:36:53 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Weston Again
Message-ID: <acgog5+gpq5@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 803
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "njcopperjohn" <jlorenzo@ob.ilww.com>
X-Originating-IP: 63.97.126.34
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=74013914
X-Yahoo-Profile: njcopperjohn
So with this die sharing family of English counterfeits and evasions
would not similar trace elements in thier compositions 'STRENGTHEN'
the probabilty that they all came from a single counterfeit issuer
and that they were iisued during a particular point in time
regardless of their dates??? But I already knew this John --- then
consider---
Studying then these metallurgical compositions of these 'known'
English counterfeits from above and then reviewing their compositions
would they possibly not be able to tie-in other Atkin (Cobwright)
varieties or spidery lettered counterfeits that may not immediately
be tied in by simple visual die sharing match-making techniques from
your studies? Would this 'other' tool hinder or help your attribution
process in the short or long term?
JPL. - 2002-05-22
- 1
