St. Patricks on E-Bay,V.20-87C Die Emission &J.A.D. Mayne Público Deposited
Re
- From ershye@aol.com Mon Jul 01 18:54:31 2002
Return-Path: <ershye@aol.com>
X-Sender: ershye@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 2 Jul 2002 01:54:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 42591 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2002 01:54:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Jul 2002 01:54:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n7.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.91)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2002 01:54:31 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.190] by n7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jul 2002 01:54:31 -0000
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 01:54:30 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: St. Patricks on E-Bay,V.20-87C Die Emission &J.A.D. Mayne
Message-ID: <afr14m+qis2@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <afqqke+aupl@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1051
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "ershye" <ershye@aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: 152.163.201.203
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=12795485
X-Yahoo-Profile: ershye
--- In colonial-coins@y..., "g_trudgen" <g_trudgen@y...> wrote:
> --- In colonial-coins@y..., "njcopperjohn" <jlorenzo@o...> wrote:
> Afterwards E.S. gave me the die
> > emission sequence as:
> >
> > 20-87C//19-87C//21-87C//23-87C//VT-87C
>
> John -- This sequence is correct in my opinion except you forgot 18-
> 87C. You really need to read my article titled "The Illogical and
> Curious Vermont Britannia Copper." In this article I explain the
die
> diagnostics that lead to the above sequence. With all due respect,
> you also need to "engage brain" before making some of your "wild
> statements" in an effort to force a desired conclusion or outcome.
> Let logic and science dictate the conclusion, not your emotions.
>
> Gary
Correct Gary. I did mention in my email to John that 18 came after
19. Also I mentioned that I thought that obverse 19 was reused after
the mating of obverse 18 as the terminal state obverse 19 comes with
a very worn reverse C, much later than any of the 18-87C matings. Do
you agree with this?
Ed - 2002-07-01
- 1
