[Colonial Numismatics] Re Pubblico Deposited

53-j

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From wierzba@attbi.com Thu Oct 10 17:50:40 2002
    Return-Path: <wierzba@attbi.com>
    X-Sender: wierzba@attbi.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 11 Oct 2002 00:50:40 -0000
    Received: (qmail 43536 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2002 00:50:40 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
    by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Oct 2002 00:50:40 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.83)
    by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2002 00:50:40 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.142] by n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Oct 2002 00:50:39 -0000
    Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:50:35 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re:53-j
    Message-ID: <ao578r+75sb@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <annrcs+413r@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 4627
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    From: "albioncox" <wierzba@attbi.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 66.31.167.110
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111944398
    X-Yahoo-Profile: albioncox

    I had no idea how many low grade NJs (and other colonials) existed
    until I started to search EBAY. In some cases, %50 is too much IMHO.

    Pedigree is an important attribute for a NJ, especially a Maris one,
    either plate and/or collection. John Adams in LCs swapped higher
    graded coppers for pedigreed examples. A C4 exhibit will feature ex-
    Spiro NJs.

    Choice NJs, VF or better, are very scarce, although availability is
    somewhat proportional to rarity (ie, a nice 48-g, 46-e, 6-D, etc can
    be found) For an R-6, maybe 5 or less are choice VF or better. If you
    go for varieties, not many collectors can afford or find choice only.

    Many R6's are locked up. I would guess, including museums, about 25
    variety collectors. My study of the 71-y shows between 23 to 25
    distinct coppers. The last public sale was Griffee/Taylor (to yours
    truly) in 1995. I know of a low grade 71-y sale privately a year
    later. Based on the lack of supply, I would have thought it was a
    high R6. However, the variety collector base holds the 23-25 examples
    to my surprise.

    Let's never forget to enjoy what we own and sometimes we will be able
    to buy a nice NJ at a cheap price.















    In colonial-coins@y..., "mantoloking2002" <mantoloking2002@y...>
    wrote:
    > My halfpence....
    >
    > Let's see. First, Clem nice coin and particularly at a price of
    $500.
    > As it turns out, I own the Garrett coin and I paid $800 in 1996
    when
    > New Jersey's just started to run up in value. I woould say your
    coin
    > is bit more sharply struck than mine but with a tad more wear on
    both
    > obverse and reverse. If I were to grade them, maybe 35 on yours and
    > 40 on mine but that is splitting hairs and I am a tough grader. No
    > matter, it is an excellent CC coin and a good buy and I think it
    > would bring a bit more in an auction if you turned around and tried
    > to sell it.
    >
    > As for valuation of New Jerseys, I think it really has become a
    three
    > tier market over the last several years. 1. Low end, R-4s or more
    > common coins with wear or damage move regularly on eBay for $50 to
    > $200. People are forming small low end collections or getting a low
    > end type with these. 2. Collector coins, VF to strong EF/AUs all
    the
    > way up to R-5+ that were coveted by maybe a dozen collectors from
    > 1993 to say 1998 that were highly sought after and prices ran up to
    > say $5,000 a piece. Over time all these collectors have formed very
    > nice collections with very pleasing coins. So these coins when they
    > appear are too much money for the low end and have very little
    demand
    > among the collector base of say 25 or so serious type collectors.
    > These coins, like the subject 53-j are languishing until a new crop
    > of NJ type collectors step up. Finally there are the top end coins.
    > These are coins that are AU to UNC " among finest known coins " or
    R-
    > 6+ on up rarities. These have significant demand. There are the
    type
    > collectors that need rare varieties to chase that elusive 100
    > varities number that will spend when that rare coin appears. There
    > are a few high end CC collectors that want to build out their CC
    > collections that are looking for both, and finally there are the
    > slabbers that are selling finest known (by PCGS standards) to
    > mainstream collectors that are looking for AU to UNC pieces. When a
    > tier three collection comes up, the confluence of buyers will still
    > drive high prices. Having contributed somewhat to O'Donnell, I
    would
    > say there was one surprise buyer that added maybe 20 to 25% to the
    > prices of most of the rarities but, having said that, the rest of
    the
    > prices would probably happen again. Look at Hain.
    >
    > I actually beleive that these three tiers are permiating most of
    the
    > Colonial market I think that is a shame because there is so much
    > diversity in the coinage and it should be shared among a wider
    group.
    > Love to hear differing or concurring views.
    >
    > Roger S.
    >
    > collectors--- In colonial-coins@y..., dmenchell@a... wrote:
    > > Hi Clem:
    > >
    > > Congratulations on the 53-j. Nice coin for the money, at recent
    > levels, that
    > > is. This coin was a good deal at $500, but I think a marginally
    > better coin
    > > of the same variety at $8000 is kind of dopey, even if you're the
    > Don with
    > > one of your henchmen driving up the bidding. No question that
    > coinflation
    > > was rampant at the O'Donnell sale. Hopefully, the bubble has
    burst
    > and a bit
    > > of reality will return. Otherwise, nice bust dollars and early
    > gold at
    > > under 10T seem awfully attractive by comparison.
    > >
    > > Dave M.

URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2002-10-10
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP