Hard-to-believe Condition Coins Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Contenido del artículo
  • From freidus@wwnet.net Sat Dec 14 17:57:12 2002
    Return-Path: <freidus@wwnet.net>
    X-Sender: freidus@wwnet.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 15 Dec 2002 01:57:12 -0000
    Received: (qmail 21767 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2002 01:57:08 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
    by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Dec 2002 01:57:08 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO ziggy.wwnet.net) (209.142.193.4)
    by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2002 01:57:08 -0000
    Received: (qmail 1752 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2002 02:18:19 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO ?209.142.215.166?) (209.142.215.166)
    by ziggy.wwnet.net with SMTP; 15 Dec 2002 02:18:19 -0000
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    X-Sender: freidus@mail.wwnet.net
    Message-Id: <f04310105ba219183ad12@[209.142.215.166]>
    In-Reply-To: <atgmuk+b717@eGroups.com>
    References: <atgmuk+b717@eGroups.com>
    Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:57:02 -0500
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Hard-to-believe Condition Coins
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1172205070==_ma============"
    From: Dan Freidus <freidus@wwnet.net>
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=5432296
    X-Yahoo-Profile: dfreidus

    --============_-1172205070==_ma============
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

    I completely agree with George. I've got a question about the BM
    though. If I remember correctly, the large bequest you're talking
    about was from Sophia Banks. Was she the actual collector or was it
    a male relative? (I recall an influential gnet named Banks but can't
    remember what connection he may have had to Sophia)

    Dan Freidus

    At 1:47 AM +0000 12/15/02, George Fuld <fuldy2000@yahoo.com wrote:
    >Hi folks:
    >
    >It is not hard to believe 18th century coins retain full luster. At
    >the British Museum which I checked in 1960, they had a wreath 1793
    >cent in about 80% full red. They also had a lustrous 1794 dollar
    >that was just sturck so it appeared. These were housed in coin
    >cabinets for eons, having been given to the BM about 1808 from a lady
    >collector. -
    >
    >So they can retain color if given good care.
    >
    >
    >George Fuld
    >
    >
    >
    >-- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion
    ><jagre@a...>" <jagre@a...> wrote:
    >> A dealer I work with (a well known outfit) showed me a number of
    >English
    >> coins and one or two Amercian colonials from the 1796 - 1806 era
    >that they
    >> recently purchased in a European auction.
    >>
    >> The coins were sold having been individually housed, apparently, in
    >round,
    >> single coin sized metal containers since the day they were struck.
    >I saw the
    >> metal containers - I have no reason to dispute the story.
    >>
    >> The coins are pristine, lustrous and superb to the point of being
    >simply
    >> unbelievable. Even ridiculous. No trace of darkening around the
    >devices, not
    >> even the slightest mellowing, etc.
    >>
    >> And so, as I am not all that experienced, and would have assumed
    >> automatically, that any coin from that era in that condition must be
    >cleaned,
    >> colored, dipped, etc. I ask the experts among us:
    >>
    >> Is anybody familiar with the sale I'm describing?
    >>
    >> Has anybody seen coins of this era that have been housed in such
    >> containers?
    >>
    >> Is it possible that coins stored in such a way could have survived
    >with their as-
    >> struck brilliance 100% (maybe 105%) intact?
    >>
    >> I am not considering buying these coins (in fact, I think they are
    >already sold)
    >> I'm just interested in any feedback / opinions, etc.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> John Agre
    >
    >
    >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    >colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
    >
    >
    >
    >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
    ><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

    --============_-1172205070==_ma============
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

    <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
    <html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
    blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { margin-top: 0 ; margin-bottom: 0 }
    --></style><title>[Colonial Numismatics] Re: Hard-to-believe
    Condition C</title></head><body>
    <div>I completely agree with George.  I've got a question about
    the BM though.  If I remember correctly, the large bequest
    you're talking about was from Sophia Banks.  Was she the actual
    collector or was it a male relative?  (I recall an influential
    gnet named Banks but can't remember what connection he may have had
    to Sophia)</div>
    <div><br></div>
    <div>Dan Freidus</div>
    <div><br></div>
    <div>At 1:47 AM +0000 12/15/02, George Fuld <fuldy2000@yahoo.com
    wrote:</div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite><tt>Hi folks:<br>
    <br>
    It is not hard to believe 18th century coins retain full
    luster.  At<br>
    the British Museum which I checked in 1960, they had a wreath 1793<br>
    cent in about 80% full red.  They also had a lustrous 1794
    dollar<br>
    that was just sturck so it appeared.  These were housed in
    coin<br>
    cabinets for eons, having been given to the BM about 1808 from a
    lady<br>
    collector.  -<br>
    <br>
    So they can retain color if given good care.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    George Fuld<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    -- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "colonialcoinunion<br>
    <jagre@a...>" <jagre@a...> wrote:<br>
    > A dealer I work with (a well known outfit) showed me a number
    of<br>
    English<br>
    > coins and one or two Amercian colonials from the 1796 - 1806
    era<br>
    that they<br>
    > recently purchased in a European auction.<br>
    ><br>
    > The coins were sold having been individually housed, apparently,
    in<br>
    round,<br>
    > single coin sized metal containers since the day they were
    struck. <br>
    I saw the<br>
    > metal containers - I have no reason to dispute the story.<br>
    ><br>
    > The coins are pristine, lustrous and superb to the point of
    being<br>
    simply<br>
    > unbelievable.  Even ridiculous.  No trace of darkening
    around the<br>
    devices, not<br>
    > even the slightest mellowing,  etc.<br>
    ><br>
    > And so, as I am not all that experienced, and would have
    assumed<br>
    > automatically, that any coin from that era in that condition
    must be<br>
    cleaned,<br>
    > colored, dipped, etc. I ask the experts among us:<br>
    ><br>
    > Is anybody familiar with the sale I'm describing?<br>
    ><br>
    > Has anybody seen coins of this era that have been housed in
    such<br>
    > containers?<br>
    ><br>
    > Is it possible that coins stored in such a way could have
    survived<br>
    with their as-<br>
    > struck brilliance 100% (maybe 105%) intact?<br>
    ><br>
    > I am not considering buying these coins (in fact, I think they
    are<br>
    already sold)<br>
    > I'm just interested in any feedback / opinions, etc.<br>
    ><br>
    > Thanks,<br>
    ><br>
    > John Agre<br>
    <br>
    </tt><br>
    <tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br>
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com<br>
    <br>
    </tt><br>
    <br>
    <tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the</tt> <a
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"><tt>Yahoo! Terms of
    Service</tt></a><tt>.</tt></blockquote>
    <div><br></div>
    </body>
    </html>
    --============_-1172205070==_ma============--
URL de origen Fecha de publicación
  • 2002-12-14
Volumen
  • 1

Relaciones

Autor NNP