| Artikelinhalt |
- From palmers4@erols.com Thu Dec 19 20:34:34 2002
Return-Path: <palmers4@erols.com>
X-Sender: palmers4@erols.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 20 Dec 2002 04:34:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 48980 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 04:34:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Dec 2002 04:34:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.71)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 04:34:34 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.153] by n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2002 04:34:34 -0000
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:34:33 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Unidentified Connecticut
Message-ID: <atu6kp+qo7p@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021220034402.24398.qmail@web14206.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 4328
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "dp1787 <palmers4@erols.com>" <palmers4@erols.com>
X-Originating-IP: 24.186.173.179
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=35383343
X-Yahoo-Profile: dp1787
I find that attributing Connecticuts is therapy for what ails me. As
to the Conn. being a 1/2d, that seems not to be unusual. Either way,
btw. David
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins
<joshalso2000@y...> wrote:
> Dave, really sorry to hear about the drool. You
> really should do something about that, maybe a bib or
> something, because drool leads to crusty encounters of
> the worst kind.
>
> As far as the rest of the Connecticuts are concerned
> will try to beat my head against the wall a little
> longer. I understand that is a good cure for a sinus
> headache.
>
> I just discovered one of my Connecticut
> unattributables was a counterfeit British halfpenny
> with an extremely small squeezed date. The "B" was on
> the wrong side near a foot. Dead give away.
>
> So, 27 to go.
>
> While your offer was certainly good to help attribute
> them, I find that my perverse side was saying buy more
> of them and drive him nuts. This way he can't snipe
> me. But then again, nobody in Colonials would ever
> stoop to such a lowly endeavor.
>
> Again, thanks for helping on this particular one.
>
> Morris
>
> P.S. I owe you a couple of other response privately
> and will do so within a couple of days.
>
>
>
>
> --- "dp1787 <palmers4@e...>" <palmers4@e...>
> wrote:
> > Morris, I have the tilting III's down pretty good,
> > the topless ones I
> > have a little trouble with, I keep drooling on the
> > coins. Sorry to
> > anyone with a faint heart. If you are having that
> > much trouble with
> > the Connecticuts, ship them to me and I will do them
> > for you, as best
> > I can, and send them back. All I ask is that you pay
> > postage, OR give
> > me pick of the litter. Nice VFF coins are fairly
> > easy to attribute,
> > you need a real bottom feeder like myself to get the
> > low grade pieces
> > done. I am not a guru btw, just that I have looked
> > at alot of low
> > grade Conn.'s in my time. The kind most people
> > overlook. To buy a
> > 32.8-aa in any grade for $8 and still have 5 barkers
> > to look at is a
> > good omen. David
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris
> > Hankins
> > <joshalso2000@y...> wrote:
> > > Dave, you seem to be a guru on these. Thanks.
> > Now if
> > > we could only get you to distinguish between
> > Tilting
> > > Numerals and Topless Ordinals.
> > >
> > > I know, I know, you happen to have a 1776 Tilting
> > > Topless Counterfeit, right?
> > >
> > > BTW, I still have about 28 Connecticuts to go that
> > are
> > > not identifed. Some will never be. This one you
> > > identified was one of 6 in a batch that I paid $8
> > for.
> > >
> > > Thanks again.
> > >
> > > Morris
> > >
> > >
> > > --- "dp1787 <palmers4@e...>" <palmers4@e...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Morris, Try 1787 32.8-aa. Should be correct. Not
> > a
> > > > bad pick. David
> > > >
> > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris
> > > > Hankins
> > > > <joshalso2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > Below is a 1787 Connecticut I have about 30
> > hours
> > > > in
> > > > > trying to attribute.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, with the low slung B in Etlib thought
> > > > > somebody might be able to identify.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Morris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign
> > up
> > > > now.
> > > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> > to:
> > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> > now.
> > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
|
|---|
| Quell-URL |
|
|---|
| Veröffentlichungsdatum |
|
|---|
| Volumen |
|
|---|
