[Colonial Numismatics] Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10... Öffentlichkeit Deposited
Re
- From Rosaamltd@aol.com Thu Dec 19 21:18:57 2002
Return-Path: <RosaAmLtd@aol.com>
X-Sender: RosaAmLtd@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 20 Dec 2002 05:18:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 63658 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 05:18:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Dec 2002 05:18:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m06.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.161)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 05:18:57 -0000
Received: from RosaAmLtd@aol.com
by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.10f.1bd72a85 (4254)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:18:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <10f.1bd72a85.2b34023a@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:18:50 EST
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Connecticut 56-XX vs 56-RR.2 and 37.10-RR vs 37.10...
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_10f.1bd72a85.2b34023a_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10621
From: Rosaamltd@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=36885228
X-Yahoo-Profile: rosaamltd
--part1_10f.1bd72a85.2b34023a_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Actually, you're right on that one, Ed -- it is upper case. I believe Walter
Breen had it as a lower case in the EAC '75 catalogue, and some collectors
added it to their copies of Miller as a result.
I think an article on the variety is definitely warranted, especially if you
have a new specimen -- their really hasn't been much written about it since
its discovery.
--part1_10f.1bd72a85.2b34023a_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Actually, you're right on that one, Ed -- it is upper case. I believe Walter Breen had it as a lower case in the EAC '75 catalogue, and some collectors added it to their copies of Miller as a result.<BR>
<BR>
I think an article on the variety is definitely warranted, especially if you have a new specimen -- their really hasn't been much written about it since its discovery.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_10f.1bd72a85.2b34023a_boundary-- - 2002-12-19
- 1
