| 文章內容 |
- From rogersiboni@aol.com Sat Mar 01 17:20:52 2003
Return-Path: <rogersiboni@aol.com>
X-Sender: rogersiboni@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 2 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 72744 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n28.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.84)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.138] by n28.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0000
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 01:20:47 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] New Jersey Question
Message-ID: <b3rm9f+q84t@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030302002030.28665.qmail@web14205.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1757
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "mantoloking2002 <rogersiboni@aol.com>" <rogersiboni@aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: 152.163.189.100
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=119287572
X-Yahoo-Profile: mantoloking2002
Morris,
Untill recently, they were regarded as separate varieties. However, I
think Bill Anton (others chime in on who it was) observed that they
were simply differant die states of the same variety. Nevertheless,
most people try to collect each die state. There is some disagreement
around the rarity of each die state.
Roger
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Morris Hankins
<joshalso2000@y...> wrote:
>
> Ray, thanks for your response. Are you telling me that die states
are a reason to assign new attribution numbers? What jack-donkey is
making money off this?
> Who agreed to make die states varieties? Who voted on this and
when?
> Morris
> Ray Williams <njraywms@o...> wrote:Hi Morris!, The current
terminology is Maris 77-dd Type I, Type II and Type III. I've found
the easiest way to tell the difference is that the Type I has no die
break on the obverse, Type II has the die break on the obverse only,
and Type III has a die break on both obverse and reverse. Hope that
helps. Ray----- Original Message ----- From: Morris Hankins To:
Colonial Coins Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:17 PMSubject:
[Colonial Numismatics] New Jersey Question
>
> Can someone advise me the difference between the 77dd and the
77.5dd. I have looked and looked at the obverse and am obviousily
missing something.
>
> Thanks
>
> Morris
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|---|
| 來源網址 |
|
|---|
| 發布日期 |
|
|---|
| 體積 |
|
|---|
