Some Mysteries of 19thCentury Cast Pubblico Deposited
[Colonial Numismatics] COLONIALS
Re
- From bkweston@lazerlink.com Sun Aug 24 14:02:57 2003
Return-Path: <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Sender: bkweston@lazerlink.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 15739 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 21:02:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2003 21:02:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.82)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2003 21:02:54 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.142] by n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2003 21:01:40 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:01:40 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] COLONIALS: Some Mysteries of 19thCentury Cast
Message-ID: <bib93k+ce9p@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <bib7i8+v1cr@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1143
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "Byron Weston" <bkweston@lazerlink.com>
X-Originating-IP: 199.234.152.222
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90999161
X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "mantoloking2002"
<mantoloking2002@y...> wrote:
> Thanks Byron,
>
> I must say, I am going to hate the clutter of using e-mail account
> and I will now have to upgrade my Yahoo account (ah there we go).
> Anyway, got it.
>
> Best,
>
> Roger
>
I belong to six egroups, Roger, so this and the counterfeits group
are the only ones I've presently chosen the email option for. One
thing everyone in all groups might consider is cutting out the chit-
chat, anything less than seven sentences, say, should be communicated
only between the two people that it really means anything to. Not
being critical, only practical.
I don't think most egroups members are aware that they can
communicate directly with other members simply by clicking on their
email address, in the message or in the membership roster, posted at
the site. And getting out of the habit of simply hitting "reply"
which is sort of being lazy, if you ask me. After all there's no need
carrying on personal conversations that everyone else is required to
listen to by posting them back and forth through the site messages?
Byron - 2003-08-24
- 1
