JPL MACHIN COMMENT Publique Deposited
- From sscrosby@comcast.net Tue Sep 16 17:46:02 2003
Return-Path: <sscrosby@comcast.net>
X-Sender: sscrosby@comcast.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 45273 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n32.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.100)
by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.183] by n32.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2003 00:46:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:46:01 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Subject: JPL MACHIN COMMENT
Message-ID: <bk8as9+5dav@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 415
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "albioncox" <sscrosby@comcast.net>
X-Originating-IP: 24.218.69.152
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=155713959
X-Yahoo-Profile: albioncox
John, I cannot find the post, but you were questioning the Machin
attribution where there is no die sharing with colonial issues. In
the B+M Sherr sale (6/84) there is a 73-aa overstruck on a 1747
Machin (lot 3268) which argues for U.S. circulation (and is
supportive of U.S. origin). Undertypes can provide insights, i.e.,
how few British counterfeits are found given their abundance versus
the Machin type. - 2003-09-16
- 1
