AK-47 Público Deposited
[Colonial Numismatics] Re
Re
- From jhlipsky@aol.com Sun Oct 12 21:50:42 2003
Return-Path: <JHLipsky@aol.com>
X-Sender: JHLipsky@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 46938 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2003 04:50:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Oct 2003 04:50:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r05.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.101)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2003 04:50:41 -0000
Received: from JHLipsky@aol.com
by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id r.50.2359e5cb (18251)
for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:50:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50.2359e5cb.2cbb891b@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:50:35 EDT
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: AK-47
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_50.2359e5cb.2cbb891b_boundary"
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6018
From: jhlipsky@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=36684923
X-Yahoo-Profile: jhlipsky
--part1_50.2359e5cb.2cbb891b_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I also have a coin that matches AK47. I found mine in a box of coppers that
had a couple of Blacksmiths in it and thought it might also be a Blacksmith at
that time about 15 years ago. My specimen is not completely blank on the
reverse but nearly so. I wonder if these are regal with the reverse struck
shallower than the obverse so that the reverse wears smooth before the obverse. I will
bring mine to C4.
--part1_50.2359e5cb.2cbb891b_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FAC=
E=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">I also have a coin that matches AK47. I found mine i=
n a box of coppers that had a couple of Blacksmiths in it and thought it mi=
ght also be a Blacksmith at that time about 15 years ago. My specimen is no=
t completely blank on the reverse but nearly so. I wonder if these are rega=
l with the reverse struck shallower than the obverse so that the reverse we=
ars smooth before the obverse. I will bring mine to C4.</FONT></HTML>
--part1_50.2359e5cb.2cbb891b_boundary-- - 2003-10-12
- 1
