| 文章內容 |
- From JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET Sat Jan 17 06:58:47 2004
Return-Path: <JCSpilman1@comcast.net>
X-Sender: JCSpilman1@comcast.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 83139 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 14:58:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2004 14:58:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.85)
by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 14:58:46 -0000
Received: from comcast.net (pcp01534298pcs.huntsv01.al.comcast.net[68.62.178.186])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP
id <20040117140132014006u2f1e>
(Authid: jcspilman1);
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:01:32 +0000
Message-ID: <40094035.4D3ED81C@Comcast.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:01:25 -0600
Organization: CNLF/JEANe/eSIG/The Phoenix Project
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
References: <20040117112613.61773.qmail@web21407.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------F1405EB1D7B858867861645C"
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 216.148.227.85
From: JCSpilman <JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET>
Reply-To: JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] MAJOR RARITY ON EBAY !!!!!!
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=154441963
X-Yahoo-Profile: jcspilman1
--------------F1405EB1D7B858867861645C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mike - et al
Your point is well taken. My point is actually the same as
yours. There are so many of these things floating around that
are obvious modern (last 100 years) constructs that they raise a
question - that of every good news reporter - who, what , where,
when and why?
So far as I know - there are no answers to any of these five
questions. This represents an excellent research topic and as
such deserves our attention. The original idea of this design
had to originate someplace, but we do not have any data that
tells us this! I always keep in mind that S.S.Crosby did not
know the answers to these questions when he commented on the
Virginia Halfpence of 1773 in his book - and identified them as
some sort of token.
Jim/CNLF/JEANe/eSIG/The Phoenix Project
==============================
Jim/CNLF
Michael Hodder wrote:
> On the subject of the 1776 WM NH coppers, I have never
> seen one that I thought was real and I've seen
> somewhere around 40 or 50 of them. They all look
> similar, not identical, but enough alike to suggest
> they were all made the same way...casting. Some you
> can write with, if you know what I mean. These things
> are not genuine NH coppers, IMHO.
>
>
>
> =====
> Regards
>
> Mike Hodder
> mike468hodder@yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service.
>
--------------F1405EB1D7B858867861645C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Mike - et al
<p>Your point is well taken. My point is actually the same as yours.
There are so many of these things floating around that are obvious modern
(last 100 years) constructs that they raise a question - that of every
good news reporter - who, what , where, when and why?
<p>So far as I know - there are no answers to any of these five questions.
This represents an excellent research topic and as such deserves our attention.
The original idea of this design had to originate someplace, but we do
not have any data that tells us this! I always keep in mind that
S.S.Crosby did not know the answers to these questions when he commented
on the Virginia Halfpence of 1773 in his book - and identified them as
some sort of token.
<p>Jim/CNLF/JEANe/eSIG/The Phoenix Project
<p>==============================
<p>Jim/CNLF
<p>Michael Hodder wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> <tt>On the subject of the 1776 WM NH coppers,
I have never</tt>
<br><tt>seen one that I thought was real and I've seen</tt>
<br><tt>somewhere around 40 or 50 of them. They all look</tt>
<br><tt>similar, not identical, but enough alike to suggest</tt>
<br><tt>they were all made the same way...casting. Some you</tt>
<br><tt>can write with, if you know what I mean. These things</tt>
<br><tt>are not genuine NH coppers, IMHO.</tt>
<br>
<br>
<p><tt>=====</tt>
<br><tt>Regards</tt>
<p><tt>Mike Hodder</tt>
<br><tt>mike468hodder@yahoo.com</tt>
<p>
<hr width="500"><b><tt>Yahoo! Groups Links</tt></b>
<ul>
<li>
<tt>To visit your group on the web, go to:</tt></li>
<br><tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/</a></tt>
<br>
<li>
<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:</tt></li>
<br><tt><a href="mailto:colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe">colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</a></tt>
<br>
<li>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo!
Terms of Service</a>.</tt></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</html>
--------------F1405EB1D7B858867861645C--
|
|---|
| 來源網址 |
|
|---|
| 發布日期 |
|
|---|
| 體積 |
|
|---|
