I have a ground found RR16 in pretty good shape Public Deposited
Re
- From jmkleeberg@yahoo.com Thu Jan 22 17:20:56 2004
Return-Path: <jmkleeberg@yahoo.com>
X-Sender: jmkleeberg@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 76249 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 01:20:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2004 01:20:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.82)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 01:20:54 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.174] by n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2004 01:20:54 -0000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:20:50 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <bupsti+9q42@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <001501c3e130$3c557860$59a42c44@froggy>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 683
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.82
From: "John M. Kleeberg" <jmkleeberg@yahoo.com>
X-Originating-IP: 128.59.153.159
Subject: Re: I have a ground found RR16 in pretty good shape
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=11707909
X-Yahoo-Profile: jmkleeberg
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Don H" <slospokes2@c...>
wrote:
> I have only ever found two Vermonts while metal detecting,
In his article in the Colonial News-Letter about the Stepney Hoard,
Phil Mossman posited that the reason the hoard from Stepney,
Fairfield County, Connecticut, had no New Jerseys, Fugios, or
Massachusetts coppers and predominantly had Connecticut coppers is
because the state coppers of the Confederation period usually
circulated within the borders of their states, and not outside them.
Does the pattern of coin finds confirm this? I.e. are most finds in
Vermont Vermonts, most finds in Connecticut Connecticuts, etc.?
John M. Kleeberg - 2004-01-22
- 1
