uniface medal Publique Deposited
- From 1-mar@mindspring.com Wed Jan 28 07:58:14 2004
Return-Path: <1-mar@mindspring.com>
X-Sender: 1-mar@mindspring.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 61554 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 15:41:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Jan 2004 15:41:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n21.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.77)
by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 15:41:34 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.138] by n21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2004 15:39:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:39:32 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <bv8l3k+lo29@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 568
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.77
From: "Marcus M. Mayhugh" <1-mar@mindspring.com>
X-Originating-IP: 65.165.63.60
Subject: uniface medal
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=67606264
X-Yahoo-Profile: remi66111
Yesterday I read in CW about a British (George II ?)uniface medal
sold in a recent auction. John K. said that it may not have been an
Indian piece medal but some type of military accouterment.I was
wondering if there was any other reason for a medal to be uniface.
The reason I'm asking is I have a high relief medal of George the
III that is uniface. The reverse is crisscrossed with heavy
scratches like adjustment marks. I know very little about medals and
am hoping someone might be able to tell me why this medal was made
this way?
Regards,
Marc Mayhugh - 2004-01-28
- 1
