EXPLORING 19TH CENTURY FORGERY HANK-PANKY Público Deposited

Contenido del artículo
  • From mariobyrge@comcast.net Thu Apr 08 22:24:03 2004
    Return-Path: <mariobyrge@comcast.net>
    X-Sender: mariobyrge@comcast.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 64512 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 16:58:33 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
    by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Apr 2004 16:58:33 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35)
    by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 16:58:32 -0000
    Received: from computer (bgp01097770bgs.warn1201.mi.comcast.net[68.43.146.39])
    by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP
    id <2004040815582401300spupce>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:58:24 +0000
    Message-ID: <003401c41d8a$48452580$27922b44@warn1201.mi.comcast.net>
    To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
    Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:55:22 -0500
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0031_01C41D60.5F2458E0"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 204.127.198.35
    From: "mario" <mariobyrge@comcast.net>
    Subject: EXPLORING 19TH CENTURY FORGERY HANK-PANKY
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=160753362
    X-Yahoo-Profile: jsuis2003

    ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C41D60.5F2458E0
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN SUSPECTION IN SOME OF THE EARLY SALES EVENTS OF THE 1=
    9TH CENTURY.
    If we go back to some of the earliest sales by Bangs & Merwin,.........we s=
    ee that Massachusetts silver had some hilarious catlogue descriptions,.....=
    .of course, those descriptions were the cataloguers own wording. One may no=
    tice about a "Pinetree Penny",..........based by a earlier cataloguer as a =
    "pattern",........and of course, our old friend the "1650" dated pinetrees,=
    ..........that too, a "pattern" produced by the Bay Colony of Massachusetts=
    ",........so today, after much research, we ourselves can laugh at these ea=
    rly description,.......today, we know better! If we take this step alittle =
    further,........and place ourselves at the scene, sort-of -speak,........we=
    may accept those two pinetrees as truths,.............today, we know that =
    they are nothing more than "fantasy" examples. Todays fantasy examples may=
    and probably were yesterdays "forgeries". Lets stop to think,....With litt=
    le to next to nothing knowledge of this series in, lets say,......1858,....=
    ...why would a "creator",.known as a "forgerer" would create something into=
    a fantasy of a unknown design?????? Wouldn't it be more practical to produ=
    ce a "odd" denomination,...or perhaps a "fictious date" of a design that is=
    known to have genuine and true examples? The answer: of course!,........
    Throughout the mid to late 19th century, many of the New York and Philadelp=
    hia dealers of the day knew this,......afterall, didn't they handle some "e=
    laborate coins",...either by private sale or by auction? So, with this inmi=
    nd,.........a person who wanted to monetary benefit,......would be a dealer=
    himself. I have always said, some of these dealers such as Lyman Low impos=
    ed their coin buisness as a possibly "shill",..or a "front" to dispose of s=
    ome of their products that were struck in the backroom.,...........I partic=
    ulary note that such a case with a Sommer Island gold crown,......"XX" over=
    the hog,.......the Garrett-ex Lyman Low coin,........sold for I think $12,=
    000 back in 1979,...............one of the highest prices paid for a "mere =
    forgery of a fantasy example",............!
    Credability,.......a majic word that instills in all of our minds when we n=
    egociate a deal when buying coins. I can remember many years ago, if a coll=
    ector then would have brought up a charge of forgery against a dealer for k=
    nowingly selling "false" coins, then ususally that dealer would soon to be =
    out of buisness. so why today, we in this colonial arena seem to think that=
    these" Lyman Lows, Bolens, Proskey's and Levicks,..to name a few,........w=
    hy should we think that their knowledge was so great that many have placed =
    these kindly old gents on a pedestal. Sure, they sold many true great rarit=
    ies in their day,........but how can we turn our heads on the fact that the=
    y too,........took a monetary notion to improve their bank accounts as well=
    ,........the times,.........the sign of the times,.the great Civil War,....=
    ....people were fighting and dying,..........most of these dealers had duct=
    out from fighting,..........and who was buying coins then,.............so =
    when we see Hard Times Tokens ans civil War Tokens struck in Silver, Gold, =
    White Metal,.............do we actually see these as legitimate issues from=
    private merchants, or can maybe we realize the opportunity for certain dea=
    lers to profit after the Civil War,..........afterall,.....a "Unique" off m=
    etal token would have been a rarity then,..........as most of us see it as =
    such today! So, given my basis for debate,.........wouldn't it be just as p=
    roper for those early dealers to strike colonials the same way,..........an=
    d too, to offer them as genuine examples?
    Like I have mentioned for the past several years,.......maybe today, some o=
    f us should really look hard into what we have in our collections,.........=
    .some of us may be "surprised",......we may just find "suspection",........=
    ..however, it would be no more than lets say,........a crow without a beak!
    MARIO

    ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C41D60.5F2458E0
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
    >
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" name=3DGENERATOR>
    <STYLE></STYLE>
    </HEAD>
    <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN SUSPECTION IN SOME O=
    F THE=20
    EARLY SALES EVENTS OF THE 19TH CENTURY.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If we go back to some of the earliest sale=
    s by=20
    Bangs & Merwin,.........we see that Massachusetts silver had some hilar=
    ious=20
    catlogue descriptions,......of course, those descriptions were the catalogu=
    ers=20
    own wording. One may notice about a "Pinetree Penny",..........based by a=20
    earlier cataloguer as a "pattern",........and of course, our old friend the=
    =20
    "1650" dated pinetrees,..........that too, a "pattern" produced by the Bay=
    =20
    Colony of Massachusetts",........so today, after much research, we ourselve=
    s can=20
    laugh at these early description,.......today, we know better! If we take t=
    his=20
    step alittle further,........and place ourselves at the scene, sort-of=20
    -speak,........we may accept those two pinetrees as truths,.............tod=
    ay,=20
    we know that they are nothing more than "fantasy" examples.  Todays fa=
    ntasy=20
    examples may and probably were yesterdays "forgeries". Lets stop to=20
    think,....With little to next to nothing knowledge of this series in, lets=
    =20
    say,......1858,.......why would a "creator",.known as a "forgerer" would cr=
    eate=20
    something into a fantasy of a unknown design?????? Wouldn't it be more prac=
    tical=20
    to produce a "odd" denomination,...or perhaps a "fictious date" of a design=
    that=20
    is known to have genuine and true examples? The answer: of=20
    course!,........</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Throughout the mid to late 19th century, m=
    any of=20
    the New York and Philadelphia dealers of the day knew this,......afterall,=
    =20
    didn't they handle some "elaborate coins",...either by private sale or by=20
    auction? So, with this inmind,.........a person who wanted to monetary=20
    benefit,......would be a dealer himself. I have always said, some of these=
    =20
    dealers such as Lyman Low imposed their coin buisness as a possibly "shill"=
    ,..or=20
    a "front" to dispose of some of their products that were struck in the=20
    backroom.,...........I particulary note that such a case with a Sommer Isla=
    nd=20
    gold crown,......"XX" over the hog,.......the Garrett-ex Lyman Low=20
    coin,........sold for I think $12,000 back in 1979,...............one of th=
    e=20
    highest prices paid for a "mere forgery of a fantasy=20
    example",............!</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Credability,.......a majic word that insti=
    lls in=20
    all of our minds when we negociate a deal when buying coins. I can remember=
    many=20
    years ago, if a collector then would have brought up a charge of forgery ag=
    ainst=20
    a dealer for knowingly selling "false" coins, then ususally that dealer wou=
    ld=20
    soon to be out of buisness. so why today, we in this colonial arena seem to=
    =20
    think that these" Lyman Lows, Bolens, Proskey's and Levicks,..to name a=20
    few,........why should we think that their knowledge was so great that many=
    have=20
    placed these kindly old gents on a pedestal. Sure, they sold many true grea=
    t=20
    rarities in their day,........but how can we turn our heads on the fact tha=
    t=20
    they too,........took a monetary notion to improve their bank accounts as=20
    well,........the times,.........the sign of the times,.the great Civil=20
    War,........people were fighting and dying,..........most of these dealers =
    had=20
    duct out from fighting,..........and who was buying coins then,............=
    .so=20
    when we see Hard Times Tokens ans civil War Tokens struck in Silver, Gold, =
    White=20
    Metal,.............do we actually see these as legitimate issues from priva=
    te=20
    merchants, or can maybe we realize the opportunity for certain dealers to p=
    rofit=20
    after the Civil War,..........afterall,.....a "Unique" off metal token woul=
    d=20
    have been a rarity then,..........as most of us see it as such today! So, g=
    iven=20
    my basis for debate,.........wouldn't it be just as proper for those early=
    =20
    dealers to strike colonials the same way,..........and too, to offer them a=
    s=20
    genuine examples?</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Like I have mentioned for the past several=
    =20
    years,.......maybe today, some of us should really look hard into what we h=
    ave=20
    in our collections,..........some of us may be "surprised",......we may jus=
    t=20
    find "suspection",..........however, it would be no more than lets say,....=
    ....a=20
    crow without a beak!</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MARIO</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

    ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C41D60.5F2458E0--
URL de origen Fecha de publicación
  • 2004-04-08
Volumen
  • 1

Relaciones

Autor NNP