文章內容 |
- From buell@vectrafitness.com Wed Jun 30 14:00:55 2004
Return-Path: <buell@vectrafitness.com> X-Sender: buell@vectrafitness.com X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 5950 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 21:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Jun 2004 21:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.65) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 21:00:54 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.112] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jun 2004 21:00:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:00:53 -0000 To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <cbv9m5+gbaa@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <cbv68e+gagi@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 2216 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.65 From: "Buell Ish" <buell@vectrafitness.com> X-Originating-IP: 64.122.98.10 Subject: "Intrinsic value currency"? thread X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=38148890 X-Yahoo-Profile: buellish
Steve, I suppose I took it as a person with an Econ degree (which I happen to be). In that world, currency is a synonym for paper money. Paper money is essentially fiat money, which means that it is money by decree. I've always taken the "legal tender" wording on our paper money to be a threat, "accept this at full value or else...." So when Dave said, "Intrinsic value currency"? to me that meant paper money with a melt value. The only thing I could think of is something I have seen advertised, a $100 bill made for collectors out of gold leaf foil. And I started to wonder if it would be possible to make a bill with a gold thread, such that the bill would have a melt value. I honestly thought that maybe there has been such a thing and that Dave would come back and tell me something I didn't know about. I do think that there is a broader definition of "currency" but I think it still is something that passes because the government says so...still money by decree. In other words, I doubt a broad definition of currency can include specie. So, I thought Dave's term either an oxymoron, or a term for a paper money with a melt value that I hadn't heard of. Even the pewter continental dollars would have been fiat money. That much pewter couldn't have been worth the same as that much silver. Does that clear up how I took it? Buell
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Steven G Frank" <taxi_steve929@y...> wrote: > Buell, > I'm not sure how you took this, but I think Dave was implying > the "metal" form of currency as opposed to paper, or "fiat money". > > Steve > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Buell Ish" <buell@v...> wrote: > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "palmers4@e..." > > <palmers4@e...> wrote: > > > It is kind of neat the way different things lead us in certain > > directions. > > > I seriously doubt that the paper manufactory accepted CSA Notes > as > > payment. > > > Maybe bonds?, but most likely intrinsic value currency. David > > > > > > > > > David, > > "Intrinsic value currency"? I always thought that Fiat money was > > fiat money. Is there really such a thing as "Intrinsic value > > currency"? > > Buell
|
來源網址 |
|
發布日期 |
|
體積 |
|