WM under Sprig New Jersey Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Contenido del artículo
  • From taxi_steve929@yahoo.com Fri Sep 10 05:04:32 2004
    Return-Path: <taxi_steve929@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: taxi_steve929@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 27925 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 12:04:31 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
    by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2004 12:04:31 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.108)
    by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 12:04:31 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.118] by n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2004 12:04:17 -0000
    Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:04:17 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <chs581+6teu@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <01c601c49726$68bacac0$f2fea8c0@DIANEJ33YVI95P>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 6290
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.108
    From: "Steve Frank" <taxi_steve929@yahoo.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 68.38.177.184
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM under Sprig New Jersey
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=143463627
    X-Yahoo-Profile: taxi_steve929

    This is funny. Years ago when I ordered my complete set of the
    colonial newsletter, there was a duplicate issue, which I pulled out,
    but could not throw away. I have seen the front page just about
    everyday as it sits next to the stack of CNL's I have.(At times it
    has been elsewhere...but always in view) I have never read this
    issue. Volume 30, No. 1, serial No. 84, sequential page 1128. "The
    Appleton - Massachusetts Historical Society Rhode Island Ship Token
    with Vlugtende" by Michael Hodder (TN-129). There is a large picture
    of the ship token with Vlugtende. I will read it this
    weekend....definitley. I love reading what Mike writes anyway, and
    now I have some brain fodder going into the article.....fodder for
    Hodder....this is getting to weird...should be great reading though.

    Has the CNL ever thought of re-running some of there old tech
    newsletters when they are short of material. Even if we have the
    complete set, there are very few who will just read them from start
    to finish, but rather use them as a reference and look up what is of
    interest at a particular time.....just a thought.

    Steve



    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Ray Williams <njraywms@o...>
    wrote:
    > Roger,
    > Interesting information I didn't know. I should read more
    about the history of the time period, and about the Revolutionary
    War. Your post should be consideed for the newsletter...
    > Ray
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Roger Siboni
    > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:10 AM
    > Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM under Sprig New Jersey
    >
    >
    > John,
    >
    > I think in the case of RI Ship Tokens, the progression
    is "vlugtende", scrapped off vlugtende, and then wreath over scrapped
    off vlugtende. That is differant than WM, Sprig over WM, and then
    sharp and clear sprig with no WM.
    >
    > Also, there are some that think "vlugtende" (fleeing) WAS meant
    for the obverse as well as the reverse of the RI Ship Token. About
    one year after the Battle of Rhode Island, Admiral Howe was
    vlugtending his behind out of Rhode Island as the French were
    (finally) arriving. In other words, it was a Dutch spoof on both the
    American Colonialists and the English. Arguably, they scrapped off
    the obverse vlugtende because their was a more ready market for these
    tokens in England.
    >
    > I really don't want to get into a zinc Metalurgy discussion about
    this right now, but I thought I would at least share another view.
    >
    > Roger S.
    >
    > johnmenc@o... wrote:
    > The WM was under the obverse without the 1/2 to this Rarity 9
    WM
    > example. Both were with an obverse 62. Several weeks had gone
    by
    > since the WM Higgins find and Higgins had the usual "grin" on
    his
    > face whenever he saw a C4'er walk by or when anyone was
    examining
    > his great find (rightfully so) ... so anyway ... I was walking
    by
    > maybe two Parsipanny shows later and someone who knew him
    mentioned
    > to me Higgins found something very unusual associated with this
    > R9 ... so I walked over ... and there was an example with WM
    (very
    > faint but present around 50% or so) under the sprig for a
    Morristown
    > M.62 obverse NJ. After his find what would be the next logical
    > cherrypicking step or action? ... I checked my entire
    collection ...
    > and NOTHING. I searched for a year ... and NOTHING. Then after
    a
    > year ... I stopped looking ... I think if everyone looked for a
    > year ... R6+ would not be an overstatement? for this M.62 WM
    under
    > the sprig sub-variety.
    > HMMMMM .... Rhode Island Ship Token has this type of effect ...
    > Although made in England, the legends on the token are in
    Dutch.
    > Originally the engraver mistakenly included the
    word "vlugtende"
    > (fleeing) on the obverse of the coin under the flagship.
    Clearly
    > this was meant to be on the reverse of the token which depicts
    the
    > fleeing Continental troops. This error was soon discovered and
    had
    > to be remedied, as one could easily interpret the obverse to
    mean
    > the Admiral's flagship was fleeing! The obverse die was recut
    so
    > that a wreath design replaced the offending word under the
    flagship.
    > Also, the word "vlugtende" was scrapped off the remaining
    > undistributed stock of the token that already been made.
    > The die progression seems logical?: WM, Sprig over WM then M.62
    with
    > no signs of WM.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Ray Williams
    <njraywms@o...>
    > wrote:
    > > John,
    > > Can you give us the present owner of the two coins you
    refer
    > to, or a plated auction appearance? I'd like to see an
    example. Do
    > you recall if the obverse with WM under the sprigs was a 60,
    61, 62
    > or 63?
    > > Ray
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: johnmenc@o...
    > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:33 AM
    > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM New Jersey
    > >
    > >
    > > As I mentioned earlier having seen two? examples with WM
    under
    > the
    > > sprigs it was Higgins ALSO who came up with one of these
    > examples a
    > > month or two after his discovery. All I am saying is
    everyone
    > should
    > > check there Morristown pieces in the sprig area with a
    loop ...
    > to
    > > be honest ... I have forgotten to do this lately (i.e.,
    last
    > couple
    > > of years).
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
    > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    > ADVERTISEMENT
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    > Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
    >
    > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >
    > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
    Service.

URL de origen Fecha de publicación
  • 2004-09-10
Volumen
  • 1

Relaciones

Autor NNP