WM under Sprig New Jersey Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Re

Conteúdo do artigo
  • From rogermoore435@yahoo.com Fri Sep 10 12:10:30 2004
    Return-Path: <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: rogermoore435@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 6109 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 19:10:29 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
    by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2004 19:10:29 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web52902.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.39.179)
    by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 19:10:29 -0000
    Message-ID: <20040910191014.10721.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [68.36.27.129] by web52902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:10:14 PDT
    Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: <4141D85C.15C2C0F3@Comcast.NET>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 206.190.39.179
    From: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM under Sprig New Jersey
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=65078925
    X-Yahoo-Profile: rogermoore435

    Jim, I've already sealed the things in an envelop. I
    will try your suggestion when I get them back. The
    photos are small but all the other items might be of
    interest. Roger


    --- "J.C.SPILMAN" <JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET> wrote:

    > Roger - -
    >
    > Before you mail the photos - try an experiment.
    >
    > Place the prints on a flat surface, tilted somewhat
    > if necessary,
    > and set it where it will get direct skylight, but
    > NOT direct
    > sunlight (but experiment if you like) and copy the
    > photos up
    > close with your digital camera. It will work best
    > if you have
    > your camera mounted on a tripod so that the distance
    > of lens to
    > photo is always the same. Fill the image finder
    > with the coin
    > image and be certain that focus is correct, and
    > SHARP. Shoot
    > with maximum resolution.
    >
    > I have been doing this for several years (both film
    > and digital)
    > and it works very nicely for almost any copying
    > requirement.
    >
    > Jim/CNLF
    >
    > ==============================
    >
    > Roger Moore wrote:
    >
    > > Or how about the die progression being 1)sprig
    > under
    > > scroll and 2) a later addition of the WM. "Later"
    > to
    > > be defined. Perhaps not but I think the coin(s)
    > need
    > > re-evaluation. Just my opinion. I have photos of
    > the
    > > coin as they were provided to interested parties
    > by
    > > Higgins, as well as the number of appearances for
    > it
    > > in Coin World, etc. I will be sending these to
    > Jim
    > > Spilman this weekend so that he can scan them and
    > post
    > > them for those who have not seen it. Roger - the
    > > iconoclast
    > >
    > >
    > > --- johnmenc@optonline.net wrote:
    > >
    > > > The WM was under the obverse without the 1/2 to
    > this
    > > > Rarity 9 WM
    > > > example. Both were with an obverse 62. Several
    > weeks
    > > > had gone by
    > > > since the WM Higgins find and Higgins had the
    > usual
    > > > "grin" on his
    > > > face whenever he saw a C4'er walk by or when
    > anyone
    > > > was examining
    > > > his great find (rightfully so) ... so anyway ...
    > I
    > > > was walking by
    > > > maybe two Parsipanny shows later and someone who
    > > > knew him mentioned
    > > > to me Higgins found something very unusual
    > > > associated with this
    > > > R9 ... so I walked over ... and there was an
    > example
    > > > with WM (very
    > > > faint but present around 50% or so) under the
    > sprig
    > > > for a Morristown
    > > > M.62 obverse NJ. After his find what would be
    > the
    > > > next logical
    > > > cherrypicking step or action? ... I checked my
    > > > entire collection ...
    > > > and NOTHING. I searched for a year ... and
    > NOTHING.
    > > > Then after a
    > > > year ... I stopped looking ... I think if
    > everyone
    > > > looked for a
    > > > year ... R6+ would not be an overstatement? for
    > this
    > > > M.62 WM under
    > > > the sprig sub-variety.
    > > > HMMMMM .... Rhode Island Ship Token has this
    > type of
    > > > effect ...
    > > > Although made in England, the legends on the
    > token
    > > > are in Dutch.
    > > > Originally the engraver mistakenly included the
    > word
    > > > "vlugtende"
    > > > (fleeing) on the obverse of the coin under the
    > > > flagship. Clearly
    > > > this was meant to be on the reverse of the token
    > > > which depicts the
    > > > fleeing Continental troops. This error was soon
    > > > discovered and had
    > > > to be remedied, as one could easily interpret
    > the
    > > > obverse to mean
    > > > the Admiral's flagship was fleeing! The obverse
    > die
    > > > was recut so
    > > > that a wreath design replaced the offending word
    > > > under the flagship.
    > > > Also, the word "vlugtende" was scrapped off the
    > > > remaining
    > > > undistributed stock of the token that already
    > been
    > > > made.
    > > > The die progression seems logical?: WM, Sprig
    > over
    > > > WM then M.62 with
    > > > no signs of WM.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Ray
    > Williams
    > > > <njraywms@o...>
    > > > wrote:
    > > > > John,
    > > > > Can you give us the present owner of the
    > two
    > > > coins you refer
    > > > to, or a plated auction appearance? I'd like to
    > see
    > > > an example. Do
    > > > you recall if the obverse with WM under the
    > sprigs
    > > > was a 60, 61, 62
    > > > or 63?
    > > > > Ray
    > > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > > From: johnmenc@o...
    > > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:33 AM
    > > > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM New
    > > > Jersey
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > As I mentioned earlier having seen two?
    > examples
    > > > with WM under
    > > > the
    > > > > sprigs it was Higgins ALSO who came up with
    > one
    > > > of these
    > > > examples a
    > > > > month or two after his discovery. All I am
    > > > saying is everyone
    > > > should
    > > > > check there Morristown pieces in the sprig
    > area
    > > > with a loop ...
    > > > to
    > > > > be honest ... I have forgotten to do this
    > lately
    > > > (i.e., last
    > > > couple
    > > > > of years).
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    > ADVERTISEMENT
    > [click here]
    >
    > >
    > >
    >
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > > Yahoo! Groups Links
    > >
    > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
    > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
    > >
    > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
    > to:
    > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > >
    > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
    > Yahoo! Terms
    > > of Service.
    > >
    >

URL da fonte Data de publicação
  • 2004-09-10
Volume
  • 1

Relacionamentos

Autor do PNN