WM under Sprig New Jersey Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Re

Conteúdo do artigo
  • From JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET Fri Sep 10 13:23:14 2004
    Return-Path: <JCSpilman1@comcast.net>
    X-Sender: JCSpilman1@comcast.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 84493 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 20:23:13 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
    by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2004 20:23:13 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35)
    by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 20:23:13 -0000
    Received: from comcast.net (pcp01534982pcs.huntsv01.al.comcast.net[68.62.181.102])
    by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP
    id <200409102007270130053vrne>
    (Authid: jcspilman1);
    Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:07:28 +0000
    Message-ID: <41420976.A89F29D0@Comcast.NET>
    Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:07:19 -0500
    Organization: CNLF/JEANe/eSIG/The Phoenix Project
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
    X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    References: <20040910191014.10721.qmail@web52902.mail.yahoo.com>
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="------------D1C731723D08002AB4BB1A3D"
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 204.127.198.35
    From: "J.C.SPILMAN" <JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET>
    Reply-To: JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM under Sprig New Jersey
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=154441963
    X-Yahoo-Profile: jcspilman1

    --------------D1C731723D08002AB4BB1A3D
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Thanks - it is a good process with which to experiment with
    different techniques - lighting, etc. I think that you will find
    it very useful for all sorts of applications.

    Jim/CNLF

    ===================

    Roger Moore wrote:

    > Jim, I've already sealed the things in an envelop. I
    > will try your suggestion when I get them back. The
    > photos are small but all the other items might be of
    > interest. Roger
    >
    >
    > --- "J.C.SPILMAN" <JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET> wrote:
    >
    > > Roger - -
    > >
    > > Before you mail the photos - try an experiment.
    > >
    > > Place the prints on a flat surface, tilted somewhat
    > > if necessary,
    > > and set it where it will get direct skylight, but
    > > NOT direct
    > > sunlight (but experiment if you like) and copy the
    > > photos up
    > > close with your digital camera. It will work best
    > > if you have
    > > your camera mounted on a tripod so that the distance
    > > of lens to
    > > photo is always the same. Fill the image finder
    > > with the coin
    > > image and be certain that focus is correct, and
    > > SHARP. Shoot
    > > with maximum resolution.
    > >
    > > I have been doing this for several years (both film
    > > and digital)
    > > and it works very nicely for almost any copying
    > > requirement.
    > >
    > > Jim/CNLF
    > >
    > > ==============================
    > >
    > > Roger Moore wrote:
    > >
    > > > Or how about the die progression being 1)sprig
    > > under
    > > > scroll and 2) a later addition of the WM. "Later"
    > > to
    > > > be defined. Perhaps not but I think the coin(s)
    > > need
    > > > re-evaluation. Just my opinion. I have photos of
    > > the
    > > > coin as they were provided to interested parties
    > > by
    > > > Higgins, as well as the number of appearances for
    > > it
    > > > in Coin World, etc. I will be sending these to
    > > Jim
    > > > Spilman this weekend so that he can scan them and
    > > post
    > > > them for those who have not seen it. Roger - the
    > > > iconoclast
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --- johnmenc@optonline.net wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > The WM was under the obverse without the 1/2 to
    > > this
    > > > > Rarity 9 WM
    > > > > example. Both were with an obverse 62. Several
    > > weeks
    > > > > had gone by
    > > > > since the WM Higgins find and Higgins had the
    > > usual
    > > > > "grin" on his
    > > > > face whenever he saw a C4'er walk by or when
    > > anyone
    > > > > was examining
    > > > > his great find (rightfully so) ... so anyway ...
    > > I
    > > > > was walking by
    > > > > maybe two Parsipanny shows later and someone who
    > > > > knew him mentioned
    > > > > to me Higgins found something very unusual
    > > > > associated with this
    > > > > R9 ... so I walked over ... and there was an
    > > example
    > > > > with WM (very
    > > > > faint but present around 50% or so) under the
    > > sprig
    > > > > for a Morristown
    > > > > M.62 obverse NJ. After his find what would be
    > > the
    > > > > next logical
    > > > > cherrypicking step or action? ... I checked my
    > > > > entire collection ...
    > > > > and NOTHING. I searched for a year ... and
    > > NOTHING.
    > > > > Then after a
    > > > > year ... I stopped looking ... I think if
    > > everyone
    > > > > looked for a
    > > > > year ... R6+ would not be an overstatement? for
    > > this
    > > > > M.62 WM under
    > > > > the sprig sub-variety.
    > > > > HMMMMM .... Rhode Island Ship Token has this
    > > type of
    > > > > effect ...
    > > > > Although made in England, the legends on the
    > > token
    > > > > are in Dutch.
    > > > > Originally the engraver mistakenly included the
    > > word
    > > > > "vlugtende"
    > > > > (fleeing) on the obverse of the coin under the
    > > > > flagship. Clearly
    > > > > this was meant to be on the reverse of the token
    > > > > which depicts the
    > > > > fleeing Continental troops. This error was soon
    > > > > discovered and had
    > > > > to be remedied, as one could easily interpret
    > > the
    > > > > obverse to mean
    > > > > the Admiral's flagship was fleeing! The obverse
    > > die
    > > > > was recut so
    > > > > that a wreath design replaced the offending word
    > > > > under the flagship.
    > > > > Also, the word "vlugtende" was scrapped off the
    > > > > remaining
    > > > > undistributed stock of the token that already
    > > been
    > > > > made.
    > > > > The die progression seems logical?: WM, Sprig
    > > over
    > > > > WM then M.62 with
    > > > > no signs of WM.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Ray
    > > Williams
    > > > > <njraywms@o...>
    > > > > wrote:
    > > > > > John,
    > > > > > Can you give us the present owner of the
    > > two
    > > > > coins you refer
    > > > > to, or a plated auction appearance? I'd like to
    > > see
    > > > > an example. Do
    > > > > you recall if the obverse with WM under the
    > > sprigs
    > > > > was a 60, 61, 62
    > > > > or 63?
    > > > > > Ray
    > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > > > From: johnmenc@o...
    > > > > > To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:33 AM
    > > > > > Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM New
    > > > > Jersey
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > As I mentioned earlier having seen two?
    > > examples
    > > > > with WM under
    > > > > the
    > > > > > sprigs it was Higgins ALSO who came up with
    > > one
    > > > > of these
    > > > > examples a
    > > > > > month or two after his discovery. All I am
    > > > > saying is everyone
    > > > > should
    > > > > > check there Morristown pieces in the sprig
    > > area
    > > > > with a loop ...
    > > > > to
    > > > > > be honest ... I have forgotten to do this
    > > lately
    > > > > (i.e., last
    > > > > couple
    > > > > > of years).
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    > > ADVERTISEMENT
    > > [click here]
    > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
    > > >
    > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
    > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
    > > >
    > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
    > > to:
    > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > >
    > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
    > > Yahoo! Terms
    > > > of Service.
    > > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    ADVERTISEMENT
    [click here]

    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
    >
    > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >
    > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
    > of Service.
    >

    --------------D1C731723D08002AB4BB1A3D
    Content-Type: multipart/related;
    boundary="------------0889B6A702CD3105B2DFE58E"

    --------------0889B6A702CD3105B2DFE58E
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
    <html>
    Thanks - it is a good process with which to experiment with different techniques
    - lighting, etc.  I think that you will find it very useful for all
    sorts of applications.
    <p>Jim/CNLF
    <p>===================
    <p>Roger Moore wrote:
    <blockquote TYPE=CITE> <tt>Jim,  I've already sealed the things
    in an envelop.  I</tt>
    <br><tt>will try your suggestion when I get them back.  The</tt>
    <br><tt>photos are small but all the other items might be of</tt>
    <br><tt>interest.  Roger</tt>
    <br> 
    <p><tt>--- "J.C.SPILMAN" <JCSpilman1@Comcast.NET> wrote:</tt>
    <p><tt>> Roger - -</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> Before you mail the photos - try an experiment.</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> Place the prints on a flat surface, tilted somewhat</tt>
    <br><tt>> if necessary,</tt>
    <br><tt>> and set it where it will get direct skylight, but</tt>
    <br><tt>> NOT direct</tt>
    <br><tt>> sunlight (but experiment if you like) and copy the</tt>
    <br><tt>> photos up</tt>
    <br><tt>> close with your digital camera.  It will work best</tt>
    <br><tt>> if you have</tt>
    <br><tt>> your camera mounted on a tripod so that the distance</tt>
    <br><tt>> of lens to</tt>
    <br><tt>> photo is always the same.  Fill the image finder</tt>
    <br><tt>> with the coin</tt>
    <br><tt>> image and be certain that focus is correct, and</tt>
    <br><tt>> SHARP.  Shoot</tt>
    <br><tt>> with maximum resolution.</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> I have been doing this for several years (both film</tt>
    <br><tt>> and digital)</tt>
    <br><tt>> and it works very nicely for almost any copying</tt>
    <br><tt>> requirement.</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> Jim/CNLF</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> ==============================</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> Roger Moore wrote:</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> >  Or how about the die progression being 1)sprig</tt>
    <br><tt>> under</tt>
    <br><tt>> > scroll and 2) a later addition of the WM.  "Later"</tt>
    <br><tt>> to</tt>
    <br><tt>> > be defined.  Perhaps not but I think the coin(s)</tt>
    <br><tt>> need</tt>
    <br><tt>> > re-evaluation.  Just my opinion.  I have photos of</tt>
    <br><tt>> the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > coin as they were provided to interested parties</tt>
    <br><tt>> by</tt>
    <br><tt>> > Higgins, as well as the number of appearances for</tt>
    <br><tt>> it</tt>
    <br><tt>> > in Coin World, etc.  I will be sending these to</tt>
    <br><tt>> Jim</tt>
    <br><tt>> > Spilman this weekend so that he can scan them and</tt>
    <br><tt>> post</tt>
    <br><tt>> > them for those who have not seen it.  Roger - the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > iconoclast</tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > --- johnmenc@optonline.net wrote:</tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > > The WM was under the obverse without the 1/2 to</tt>
    <br><tt>> this</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Rarity 9 WM</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > example. Both were with an obverse 62. Several</tt>
    <br><tt>> weeks</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > had gone by</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > since the WM Higgins find and Higgins had the</tt>
    <br><tt>> usual</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > "grin" on his</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > face whenever he saw a C4'er walk by or when</tt>
    <br><tt>> anyone</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > was examining</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > his great find (rightfully so) ... so anyway ...</tt>
    <br><tt>> I</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > was walking by</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > maybe two Parsipanny shows later and someone who</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > knew him mentioned</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > to me Higgins found something very unusual</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > associated with this</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > R9 ... so I walked over ... and there was an</tt>
    <br><tt>> example</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > with WM (very</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > faint but present around 50% or so) under the</tt>
    <br><tt>> sprig</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > for a Morristown</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > M.62 obverse NJ. After his find what would be</tt>
    <br><tt>> the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > next logical</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > cherrypicking step or action? ... I checked my</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > entire collection ...</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > and NOTHING. I searched for a year ... and</tt>
    <br><tt>> NOTHING.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Then after a</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > year ... I stopped looking ... I think if</tt>
    <br><tt>> everyone</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > looked for a</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > year ... R6+ would not be an overstatement? for</tt>
    <br><tt>> this</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > M.62 WM under</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > the sprig sub-variety.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > HMMMMM .... Rhode Island Ship Token has this</tt>
    <br><tt>> type of</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > effect ...</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Although made in England, the legends on the</tt>
    <br><tt>> token</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > are in Dutch.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Originally the engraver mistakenly included the</tt>
    <br><tt>> word</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > "vlugtende"</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > (fleeing) on the obverse of the coin under the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > flagship. Clearly</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > this was meant to be on the reverse of the token</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > which depicts the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > fleeing Continental troops. This error was soon</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > discovered and had</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > to be remedied, as one could easily interpret</tt>
    <br><tt>> the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > obverse to mean</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > the Admiral's flagship was fleeing! The obverse</tt>
    <br><tt>> die</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > was recut so</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > that a wreath design replaced the offending word</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > under the flagship.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Also, the word "vlugtende" was scrapped off the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > remaining</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > undistributed stock of the token that already</tt>
    <br><tt>> been</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > made.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > The die progression seems logical?: WM, Sprig</tt>
    <br><tt>> over</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > WM then M.62 with</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > no signs of WM.</tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Ray</tt>
    <br><tt>> Williams</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > <njraywms@o...></tt>
    <br><tt>> > > wrote:</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > > John,</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >     Can you give us the present owner
    of the</tt>
    <br><tt>> two</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > coins you refer</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > to, or a plated auction appearance?  I'd like to</tt>
    <br><tt>> see</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > an example.  Do</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > you recall if the obverse with WM under the</tt>
    <br><tt>> sprigs</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > was a 60, 61, 62</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > or 63?</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > > Ray</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   ----- Original Message -----</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   From: johnmenc@o...</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:33 AM</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM New</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > Jersey</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   As I mentioned earlier having seen two?</tt>
    <br><tt>> examples</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > with WM under</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > the</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   sprigs it was Higgins ALSO who came up with</tt>
    <br><tt>> one</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > of these</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > examples a</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   month or two after his discovery. All I am</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > saying is everyone</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > should</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   check there Morristown pieces in the sprig</tt>
    <br><tt>> area</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > with a loop ...</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > to</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   be honest ... I have forgotten to do this</tt>
    <br><tt>> lately</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > (i.e., last</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > couple</tt>
    <br><tt>> > > >   of years).</tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> > ></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> >                   
    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor</tt>
    <br><tt>>                        
    ADVERTISEMENT</tt>
    <br><tt>>                         
    [click here]</tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br><tt>---------------------------------------------------------------</tt>
    <br><tt>> > Yahoo! Groups Links</tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> >    * To visit your group on the web, go to:</tt>
    <br><tt>> >      <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/</a></tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> >    * To unsubscribe from this group, send an
    email</tt>
    <br><tt>> to:</tt>
    <br><tt>> >      colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>> >    * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    the</tt>
    <br><tt>> Yahoo! Terms</tt>
    <br><tt>> >      of Service.</tt>
    <br><tt>> ></tt>
    <br><tt>></tt>
    <br> 
    <p></blockquote>
    </html>

    --------------0889B6A702CD3105B2DFE58E
    Content-Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
    Content-ID: <part1.41420976.6619C48C@Comcast.NET>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Content-Type: image/gif
    Content-ID: <part1.41420976.6619C48C@Comcast.NET>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    Content-Disposition: inline; filename="/Macintosh%20HD/Temporary%20Items/nsmail2.gif"

    --------------0889B6A702CD3105B2DFE58E
    Content-Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
    Content-ID: <part2.41420976.6619C48C@Comcast.NET>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Content-Type: image/gif
    Content-ID: <part2.41420976.6619C48C@Comcast.NET>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    Content-Disposition: inline; filename="/Macintosh%20HD/Temporary%20Items/nsmail3.gif"

    --------------0889B6A702CD3105B2DFE58E--

    --------------D1C731723D08002AB4BB1A3D--
URL da fonte Data de publicação
  • 2004-09-10
Volume
  • 1

Relacionamentos

Autor do PNN