WM under Sprig New Jersey Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Re

Conteúdo do artigo
  • From dmenchell@aol.com Sun Sep 12 02:48:48 2004
    Return-Path: <DMenchell@aol.com>
    X-Sender: DMenchell@aol.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 42598 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 09:48:47 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
    by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Sep 2004 09:48:47 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m20.mx.aol.com) (64.12.137.1)
    by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 2004 09:48:47 -0000
    Received: from DMenchell@aol.com
    by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.4.) id r.6.332c3703 (4362)
    for <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:48:41 -0400 (EDT)
    Message-ID: <6.332c3703.2e757579@aol.com>
    Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:48:41 EDT
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1094982521"
    X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5032
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.12.137.1
    From: dmenchell@aol.com
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: WM under Sprig New Jersey
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=35053915
    X-Yahoo-Profile: kollectorking

    -------------------------------1094982521
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Hi Jim, Mike, at al:

    Other examples which immediately come to mind include the U.S. Mint's medal
    commemorating the first steam coinage, with the date first listed as FEB. 22,
    and the Washington Before Boston medal struck at the Paris Mint with the error
    date MCCLXXVI (1276). The First Steam Coinage medal was to be struck on
    Washington's birthday, but the actual event was delayed until March 23rd due to
    mechanical problems. There are examples of the medal with the original FEB. 22
    date and the subsequent MAR. 23 date punched over the original date.

    As for the error date Washington Before Boston, there had been speculation
    originally that the error reverse was an early die trial. However, examples
    using this reverse have the obverse die with more advanced die rust than
    specimens with the correct date and original reverse (Boston Public Library specimen
    in gold and others in silver and bronze). It is now believed that the error
    date reverse was prepared as a replacement for the original reverse die which
    probably failed in the 1790's, and the date was subsequently corrected to
    MDCCLXXVI. This die was used until the 1820's (the first Paris restrike)., when it
    failed and was replaced by a third reverse (the second Paris restrike).

    Best regards,

    Dave M.

    -------------------------------1094982521
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <HTML><HEAD>
    <META charset=3DUS-ASCII http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; ch=
    arset=3DUS-ASCII">
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
    <BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff=
    ff">
    <DIV>Hi Jim, Mike, at al:</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>Other examples which immediately come to mind include the U.S. Mi=
    nt's medal commemorating the first steam coinage, with the date first liste=
    d as FEB. 22, and the Washington Before Boston medal struck at the Paris Mi=
    nt with the error date MCCLXXVI (1276).  The First Steam Coinage medal=
    was to be struck on Washington's birthday, but the actual event was delaye=
    d until March 23rd due to mechanical problems.  There are examples of =
    the medal with the original FEB. 22 date and the subsequent MAR. 23 date pu=
    nched over the original date.  </DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>As for the error date Washington Before Boston, there had been specula=
    tion originally that the error reverse was an early die trial.  Howeve=
    r, examples using this reverse have the obverse die with more advanced die =
    rust than specimens with the correct date and original reverse (Boston Publ=
    ic Library specimen in gold and others in silver and bronze).  It is n=
    ow believed that the error date reverse was prepared as a replacement for t=
    he original reverse die which probably failed in the 1790's, and the date w=
    as subsequently corrected to MDCCLXXVI.  This die was used until the 1=
    820's (the first Paris restrike)., when it failed and was replaced by =
    a third reverse (the second Paris restrike).</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>Best regards,</DIV>
    <DIV> </DIV>
    <DIV>Dave M.</DIV></BODY></HTML>

    -------------------------------1094982521--
URL da fonte Data de publicação
  • 2004-09-12
Volume
  • 1

Relacionamentos

Autor do PNN