| Conteúdo do artigo |
- From 1-mar@mindspring.com Fri Dec 31 14:55:43 2004
Return-Path: <1-mar@mindspring.com>
X-Sender: 1-mar@mindspring.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 99382 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2004 22:55:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Dec 2004 22:55:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.66)
by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Dec 2004 22:55:43 -0000
Received: from [4.245.42.51] (helo=yourw92p4bhlzg)
by smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1CkVgK-0003c8-FT
for colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:55:42 -0500
Message-ID: <001f01c4ef8b$d52f8390$332af504@yourw92p4bhlzg>
To: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>
References: <cqv3nh+sj0a@eGroups.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:55:26 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01C4EF59.86DB66F0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-ELNK-Trace: de9e53d223a0d361d4c20f6b8d69d88842db76727cc5621bc87603202cbbff74550261bd300b3950350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 209.86.89.66
From: "Marc Mayhugh" <1-mar@mindspring.com>
X-Originating-IP: 4.245.42.51
Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Eric P. Newman and the 50% circulation concept
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=67606264
X-Yahoo-Profile: remi66111
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C4EF59.86DB66F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John,
Thanks for not being too greedy.
Marc
----- Original Message -----=20
From: johnmenc@optonline.net=20
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Eric P. Newman and the 50% circulatio=
n concept
Cobwright currently believes that most of the evasions are of a=20
1790'ish minting period ... regardless of the date on these=20
specimens based on several recent correspondences. I am sure this=20
would ALSO tie-in a "certain" percentage of the 1775's. Which ones -=20
we may never know - obviously.
Since people were using these non-regal halfpence a couple of non-
regal dates like 1794 are not unexpected and most specimens struck=20
past 1775 are of course DESIRABLE particularly if GEORGE II.=20
Of course - why create any resitance just keep the date back-dated=20
as 1775 even though the calender in front of you reads 1794.
Looking at the other side of the spectrum ... I have one specimen in=20
my collection of a GEORGE II English halfpence dated 1717! OK - so=20
the engraver slipped and made a "1" instead of a "4" in the third=20
digit? It still reads 1717.=20
It's a crazy series ... sometimes.=20
J.F.Atlee ...good grab on that 1747 Counterfeiting Act on E-Bay.=20
Actually I have that ACT already in my library as I purchased it=20
privately a couple of years back privately from a England Book=20
Dealer on the Internet. I was just being GREEDY. But any lover of=20
Blacksmiths can't be all BAD. You have been slightly annoying to me=20
recently on your determined & focused buying habits <BG>.
John Lorenzo
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Byron Weston" <bkw11@p...>=20
wrote:
>=20
> --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino"=20
> <copperclem@c...> wrote:
> > Hey John,
> >=20
> >=20=20
> >=20
> > Well I know that Byron has at least three different varieties,=20
one=20
> of George
> > II and two of George III 1/2d "dated" 1794.
> >=20
> >=20=20
> >=20
> > Clem
>=20
> The Geo. II piece is Simian, related to Atkins-95, and both=20
Geo.III=20
> issues have the same reverse that links with Cobwright's group B=20
> Evasions, using a very similar or the same reverse Britannia=20
device=20
> with some in that group of Evasions.
> Byron
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor=20
ADVERTISEMENT
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/
=20=20=20=20=20=20
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
=20=20=20=20=20=20
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service=
.=20
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C4EF59.86DB66F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for not being too greedy.</FONT></D=
IV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Marc</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LE=
FT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>Fro=
m:</B>=20
<A title=3Djohnmenc@optonline.net=20
href=3D"mailto:johnmenc@optonline.net">johnmenc@optonline.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcolonial-coins@yahoogroups.com=20
href=3D"mailto:colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com">colonial-coins@yahoogroups=
.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 29, 2004=
2:23=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Colonial Numismatics] Re=
: Eric=20
P. Newman and the 50% circulation concept</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><TT><BR>Cobwright currently believes that most of the evas=
ions=20
are of a <BR>1790'ish minting period ... regardless of the date on these=
=20
<BR>specimens based on several recent correspondences. I am sure this=20
<BR>would ALSO tie-in a "certain" percentage of the 1775's. Which ones -=
=20
<BR>we may never know - obviously.<BR><BR>Since people were using these=20
non-regal halfpence a couple of non-<BR>regal dates like 1794 are not=20
unexpected and most specimens struck <BR>past 1775 are of course DESIRABL=
E=20
particularly if GEORGE II. <BR><BR>Of course - why create any resitance j=
ust=20
keep the date back-dated <BR>as 1775 even though the calender in front of=
you=20
reads 1794.<BR><BR>Looking at the other side of the spectrum ... I have o=
ne=20
specimen in <BR>my collection of a GEORGE II English halfpence dated 1717=
! OK=20
- so <BR>the engraver slipped and made a "1" instead of a "4" in the thir=
d=20
<BR>digit? It still reads 1717. <BR><BR>It's a crazy series ... sometimes=
.=20
<BR><BR>J.F.Atlee ...good grab on that 1747 Counterfeiting Act on E-Bay.=
=20
<BR>Actually I have that ACT already in my library as I purchased it=20
<BR>privately a couple of years back privately from a England Book <BR>De=
aler=20
on the Internet. I was just being GREEDY. But any lover of <BR>Blacksmith=
s=20
can't be all BAD. You have been slightly annoying to me <BR>recently on y=
our=20
determined & focused buying habits <BG>.<BR><BR>John=20
Lorenzo<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.=
com,=20
"Byron Weston" <bkw11@p...> <BR>wrote:<BR>> <BR>> --- In=20
colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Clement V. Schettino" <BR>>=20
<copperclem@c...> wrote:<BR>> > Hey John,<BR>> > <BR>&g=
t;=20
> <BR>> > <BR>> > Well I know that Byron has at leas=
t=20
three different varieties, <BR>one <BR>> of George<BR>> > II and=
two=20
of George III 1/2d "dated" 1794.<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>>=
;=20
> <BR>> > Clem<BR>> <BR>> The Geo. II piece is Simian, rel=
ated=20
to Atkins-95, and both <BR>Geo.III <BR>> issues have the same reverse =
that=20
links with Cobwright's group B <BR>> Evasions, using a very similar or=
the=20
same reverse Britannia <BR>device <BR>> with some in that group of=20
Evasions.<BR>> Byron<BR><BR><BR><BR></TT><BR></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C4EF59.86DB66F0--
|
|---|
| URL da fonte |
|
|---|
| Data de publicação |
|
|---|
| Volume |
|
|---|
