Batty on CD, limited edition Public Deposited
Re
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb1f/aeb1f75983c8651acdc888d9e6f34e633cecbfa2" alt=""
- From johnmenc@optonline.net Tue Jan 04 10:32:53 2005
Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net>
X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 92399 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 18:32:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jan 2005 18:32:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n16a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.45)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2005 18:32:53 -0000
Received: from [66.218.69.3] by n16.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2005 18:32:45 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.253] by mailer3.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2005 18:32:43 -0000
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:32:41 -0000
To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <creng9+a53k@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <crekbc+ji07@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1569
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.94.237.45
From: johnmenc@optonline.net
X-Originating-IP: 65.164.33.248
Subject: Re: Batty on CD, limited edition
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553
X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4
I did complile the GII years and compared them to Mr. Ed's PW
listing of GII's a couple of years back with no NEW additions found -
but I am sure Mr. Ed ALREADY factored Batty into his PW compilation.
John Lorenzo
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Byron Weston" <bkw11@p...>
wrote:
>
> --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, johnmenc@o... wrote:
> >
> > Not to downplay this offer Byron but my recollection of this
> > reference based on some back and forth with Kleeburgh a couple
of
> > years back at the ANS is that just supplies the YEAR in which
Batty
> > found counterfeits in GII & GIII. In today's world and with the
> > current CNL project how much value is this information??? Did I
> miss
> > something here ... in your opinion ... does Batty give us
something
> > MORE???
> >
> > John Lorenzo
>
> It's not likely that many counterfeits could be matched to Batty's
> descriptions outside the odd-dated years, John, but I thought
> someone, besides myself, might like to try. I've matched a few
Geo.II
> issues to Batty's descriptions as well but you still cannot be
> absolutely certain in most cases. One Geo.III issue that I am
> absolutely certain matches one of Batty's descriptions is his 3826.
> Perhaps an interesting reference nontheless, but I'm certainly not
> going to twist anyone's arm. This is simply a personal project
that I
> thought others might be interested in as a point of reference, if
for
> no other reason. It's not a "commercial" undertaking in the
strictest
> sense, that's for sure!
> Byron - 2005-01-04
- 1