[Colonial Numismatics] Why Silver Wood Pieces Syd??? Pubblico Deposited

Re

Contenuto dell'articolo
  • From johnmenc@optonline.net Thu Jan 06 12:00:09 2005
    Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net>
    X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 425 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 20:00:09 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
    by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Jan 2005 20:00:09 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n6a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.40)
    by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 20:00:09 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.69.1] by n6.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2005 19:58:54 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.67.137] by mailer1.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2005 19:58:54 -0000
    Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:58:49 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <crk59p+amuj@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <20.3bbb2f0d.2f0ee604@aol.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 5107
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.94.237.40
    From: johnmenc@optonline.net
    X-Originating-IP: 65.164.33.248
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Why Silver Wood Pieces Syd???
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553
    X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4


    Good post Jeff ... really ... but your writings below ... are they
    not similar to Brian's or to Syd's which is just right around the
    corner ... in terms of ... good quality coins obviously must have
    passed to a needy population of people in Ireland. Having collected
    Irish coinage for 10 years from the Hiberno Norse period and upward
    to George I (my collection was sold untitled by Stacks CG a couple
    of years back) - I can relate to the universal second rate nature of
    the Irish coinage (in general) compared to the English counterparts
    in terms of weight, style and execution.
    The key words here are "must have passed." Still I see no evidence
    to this fact other than someone saying to me "Does this not seem
    logical that such a beautiful coin as the 1723 Hibernia halfpence
    would have circulated FREELY - side by side with the regals and
    contempraries of this time?" Sure - it seems favorable ... but show
    me some physical proof in terms of transaction records, etc.
    Since this was suppose to be a contract for YEARS and we see that
    after the first real year of distribution (1723) the coinage is
    suddenly halted one year later (1724) ... how freely did this
    debased? brass coinage circulate. Swifts comparisons in the
    Drapier's from my understanding was again comparing WW's brass
    coinage to the exisiting English regal pieces. Yes - Apples &
    Oranges which Swift used to his advantage. Sure the differnetial is
    not that bad as you indicate but its there & Swift capitilized on
    this situation.
    Perhaps if this Wood coinage ever got off the ground ... it would
    seem logical that a twopence size Wood piece ... would have been
    produced. Although ... we are talking about the Irish in the early
    18th century ... would these second rate citizens actually need a
    brass coiange of such a size? OOOPS - I slipped on the keyboard ...
    I forgot some people simply want the arrow pointing the other
    way ... AWAY FROM SWIFT ... this is 2005 and this does make your
    Nelson 8's glow that much better!

    My wife is Irish by the way ...




    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Rosaamltd@a... wrote:
    > John, you are assuming here that all the British posessions had a
    > circulating coinage that was equal in weight and fineness to those
    produced by the
    > Tower mint in London, aren't you? Comparing British George II
    and George III
    > coinage to the Woods pieces is comparing apples to oranges -- you
    need to
    > compare IRISH George II and George III pieces to the Wood
    issues. Even if Ireland
    > is a heck of a lot closer to London than America is, anything
    produced in
    > England would have to be shipped over there and the pieces would
    need to be
    > placed in circulation at some expense to the crown; that expense
    would most
    > likely be taken "off the top" as a slight decrease in the weight
    or fineness of a
    > particular piece (or in the case of the Rosa Americana series as
    an increase
    > in the valuation -- so that a coin the size of a Hibernia
    farthing now became
    > a Rosa Americana halfpenny, and on up the scale). So a few
    grains
    > difference between standard BRITISH weight and Woods coinages
    would not have been that
    > bad at all, and would have actually been a bonus to Irish
    merchants, as even
    > a Hibernia at 5 grains less would still weight a lot more than
    the
    > counterfeit British and Irish pieces and 17th & early 18th
    century token coinages that
    > would have probably made up the majority of pieces in circulation
    in Ireland
    > at the time.
    >
    > Swift was an interesting character, but he was one that held
    grudges pretty
    > much for his entire life -- if you read through "Gulliver's
    Travels" you can
    > occasionally figure out the exact person he was mocking or
    satirizing, but to
    > a contemporary the text would have read closer to something like
    today's
    > "National Enquirer" in that it slammed just about every authority
    who ever dared
    > to disagree with Swift. No doubt somewhere along the line Wood
    must have
    > given insult to Swift and Swift must have taken great pleasure in
    being able to
    > adopt yet another persona, the Drapier, to mock the man and his
    coinage.
    > The fact that the coinage was good, was definitely useful and
    particularly
    > needed in Ireland didn't seem to matter much to Swift, and when
    Wood's enterprise
    > failed there would have certainly been a shortage of circulating
    specie
    > which would then be filled with -- what else -- low weight, crude
    counterfeits of
    > regal types that were actually LESS valuable than the Wood pieces!
    >
    > And a tangent -- something that I've always wondered about, and
    maybe Syd
    > can comment on. If the Hibernia farthing is about the size of the
    Rosa
    > halfpenny, and the Hibernia halfpenny is about the size of the
    Rosa penny, then why
    > do we have a Rosa twopence and NOT a Hibrenia penny? It would
    seem logical
    > to have such a coin, especially since Wood must have had
    equipment capable of
    > making planchets that size and thickness and presses that could
    strike such a
    > piece...
    >
    > Jeff Rock



URL di origine Data di pubblicazione
  • 2005-01-06
Volume
  • 1

Le relazioni

Autore NNP