Contenuto dell'articolo |
- From johnmenc@optonline.net Fri Jan 07 18:11:05 2005
Return-Path: <johnmenc@optonline.net> X-Sender: johnmenc@optonline.net X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 9775 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 02:11:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jan 2005 02:11:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n2a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.36) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 02:11:04 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.58] by n2.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jan 2005 02:11:04 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.165] by mailer7.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jan 2005 02:11:04 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:11:02 -0000 To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <crnffm+jl4f@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <crncjt+t53b@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 5207 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.94.237.36 From: johnmenc@optonline.net X-Originating-IP: 67.83.172.112 Subject: Re: Why Silver Wood Pieces Syd??? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=111282553 X-Yahoo-Profile: colonial_john_c4
For those of you who are reading the Drapier's I would NEXT recommend this reference which provides an INCREDIBLE Historical section commenting on my concerns & arguments on the actual degree of circulation as well as the MIND BOGGLING Declarations and Petitions illustrated in this section AGAINST this coinage. See:
The Drapier's Letters to the People of Ireland against receiving Wood's Halfpence by Johnathan Swift. Edited by Herbert Davis. Oxford. At the Clarendon Press. MCMXXXV.
On page lxi in the Historical Section it reads ...and the people of Dublin rejoiced as at a great triumph, and openly celebrated the victory of the Drapier.
If after reading the Historical section of the Davis treatment on the Drapier's you still feel this coinage freely circulated ... well everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, johnmenc@o... wrote: > > In terms of the Rosa Twopence and probably why this denomination was > issued ... are you aware of the Holles Newcastle letter to the > Governor of New Hampshire on 29 October 1725??? > > > > > --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, "Sydney F. Martin" > <sfmartin5@c...> wrote: > > Remember -- Irish and English money was not at parity, accounting > for > > the differences John Lorenzo is so concerned about. Syd > > > > Rosaamltd@a... wrote: > > > > > John, you are assuming here that all the British posessions had > a > > > circulating coinage that was equal in weight and fineness to > those > > > produced by the Tower mint in London, aren't you? Comparing > British > > > George II and George III coinage to the Woods pieces is > comparing > > > apples to oranges -- you need to compare IRISH George II and > George > > > III pieces to the Wood issues. Even if Ireland is a heck of a > lot > > > closer to London than America is, anything produced in England > would > > > have to be shipped over there and the pieces would need to be > placed > > > in circulation at some expense to the crown; that expense would > most > > > likely be taken "off the top" as a slight decrease in the weight > or > > > fineness of a particular piece (or in the case of the Rosa > Americana > > > series as an increase in the valuation -- so that a coin the > size of a > > > Hibernia farthing now became a Rosa Americana halfpenny, and on > up the > > > scale). So a few grains difference between standard BRITISH > weight > > > and Woods coinages would not have been that bad at all, and > would have > > > actually been a bonus to Irish merchants, as even a Hibernia at > 5 > > > grains less would still weight a lot more than the counterfeit > British > > > and Irish pieces and 17th & early 18th century token coinages > that > > > would have probably made up the majority of pieces in > circulation in > > > Ireland at the time. > > > > > > Swift was an interesting character, but he was one that held > grudges > > > pretty much for his entire life -- if you read > through "Gulliver's > > > Travels" you can occasionally figure out the exact person he was > > > mocking or satirizing, but to a contemporary the text would have > read > > > closer to something like today's "National Enquirer" in that it > > > slammed just about every authority who ever dared to disagree > with > > > Swift. No doubt somewhere along the line Wood must have given > insult > > > to Swift and Swift must have taken great pleasure in being able > to > > > adopt yet another persona, the Drapier, to mock the man and his > > > coinage. The fact that the coinage was good, was definitely > useful > > > and particularly needed in Ireland didn't seem to matter much to > > > Swift, and when Wood's enterprise failed there would have > certainly > > > been a shortage of circulating specie which would then be filled > with > > > -- what else -- low weight, crude counterfeits of regal types > that > > > were actually LESS valuable than the Wood pieces! > > > > > > And a tangent -- something that I've always wondered about, and > maybe > > > Syd can comment on. If the Hibernia farthing is about the size > of the > > > Rosa halfpenny, and the Hibernia halfpenny is about the size of > the > > > Rosa penny, then why do we have a Rosa twopence and NOT a > Hibrenia > > > penny? It would seem logical to have such a coin, especially > since > > > Wood must have had equipment capable of making planchets that > size and > > > thickness and presses that could strike such a piece... > > > > > > Jeff Rock > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ------- > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/ > > > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com? > subject=Unsubscribe> > > > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > > > >
|
URL di origine |
|
Data di pubblicazione |
|
Volume |
|