Evasions - Did they ever circulate? Probably Public Deposited

Re

Article content
  • From BKWeston@LazerLink.com Wed Jan 26 12:21:29 2005
    Return-Path: <BKWeston@LazerLink.com>
    X-Sender: BKWeston@LazerLink.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 90381 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 20:21:28 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
    by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Jan 2005 20:21:28 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n4a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.38)
    by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 20:21:28 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.58] by n4.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jan 2005 20:21:26 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.79] by mailer7.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jan 2005 20:21:26 -0000
    Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:21:24 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <ct8u44+uf1c@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <ct8o31+qg6p@eGroups.com>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Content-Length: 4148
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.94.237.38
    From: "Byron Weston" <BKWeston@LazerLink.com>
    X-Originating-IP: 199.234.152.214
    Subject: Re: Evasions - Did they ever circulate? Probably
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90999161
    X-Yahoo-Profile: bkweston


    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, johnmenc@o... wrote:

    > Specifics ... Byron ... please give me SOME argumentative=20
    > specifics ... until then I will wait at my current position on this=20
    > Weston contemporary counterfeit parabolic curve of knowledge <BG>.
    >=20
    > Remember Byron ... the argument here is NOT AT ALL or NOT AT ALL=20
    > DURING THE PRE-CONFEDERATION PERIOD. I await your one singular=20
    > counter-argument to my post.=20

    First of all, John, I don't think many people still combined the so-
    called Blacksmiths, contemporary counterfeit British halfpence, and=20
    Atlee/Machin's Mills pieces lumping them all together as Bungtowns.=20
    (BTW, you forgot the Evasions.) That tells me just how behind the=20
    times you are in your thinking.=20
    On the contrary I believe that most true collectors do differentiate=20
    between them and most have for a long time, and probably don't=20
    collect all of these "series." More knowledgeable collectors are=20
    likely to specialize in only one or perhaps two of these "series"=20
    while perhaps occasionally picking up one or another of the others on=20
    the bourse floor from "old school" dealers who are as far behind in=20
    their thinking as you that they have them marked "Bungtown." (I've=20
    also seen many pieces that would fit into any of these series=20
    marked "Invasion," or as one of the state coinages, or as "Machin=20
    Mills,"or as genuine.) I've always found this very amusing,=20
    personally, but I'm sure that others have as well. I must confess=20
    though that I've found myself lucky on numerous occasions that many=20
    dealers still don't differentiate one from the other. Ignorance and=20
    knowledge cab both be bliss sometimes!<s>
    I also thought the Philadelphia (not Pennsylvania) Highway Hoard was=20
    made up of cast William III issue counterfeit halfpence, so your=20
    example for what contemporary people may have thought about possibly=20
    finding that an evasion or two could have been mixed in with the=20
    George II or George III counterfeit halfpence "without it ever being=20
    isolated and classed as an evasion" makes absolutely no sense to me.=20
    BTW, I'm sure you still also hold the misconception that people of=20
    those times were ignorant, but then when was the last time you read=20
    the legends on your pocket change? Contemporary counterfeits, and=20
    perhaps the Evasions, was a product of necessity and had nothing to=20
    do with literacy. Still it wasn't very likely that a shipment of=20
    Evasions exported to North America could have been made prior to=20
    1776. Like the Simian counterfeits, Evasions came much later, despite=20
    their dates or the accuracy of their legends, and long after America=20
    was no longer a part of British North America.=20
    I'm not all that familiar with The Canadian Antiquarian & Numismatic=20
    Journal. Volume I. Second Series, April 1889-90. A Hoard of Canadian=20
    Coppers written by R.W. Mc Lachlan. But yes, I suppose that "the=20
    famous hoard of 12,000 old coppers found in
    the Bank of Montreal" could have been one of those later shipments to=20
    Canada and could have included everything including the kitchen sink,=20
    but then I guess we also don't know how that hoard got in that bank=20
    or when, so Mc Lachlan's belief that they circulated in Canada=20
    between the years of 1810 & 1837 is certainly not a matter of fact=20
    either. If there's more to that story please let me know =96 like I=20
    said, I'm not all that familiar with it. (I do wish you would've=20
    used "quotes" in your post so that I could better differentiate=20
    between your thoughts and what Mc Lachlan wrote.)
    Regardless, Mc Lachlan's thoughts are essentially obsolete, just as=20
    is the thought of Simians being American despite the fact that many=20
    have come over to America within the last two decades, or so, and=20
    they directly link to at least two Evasions with die sharing and are=20
    not "transatlantic mules."=20
    Now, John, with all this being said I'm still not sure how to answer=20
    your question, or even what the question is exactly since you have=20
    lumped everything together using the obsolete term, "Bungtowns," so=20
    now tell me which category or "series" to which you are referring and=20
    I will give you a more succinct answer to your question.
    Byron=20=20




Source URL Date published
  • 2005-01-26
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author