Geo. III, cast from a counterfeit, attached. Public Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Fw

Re

Article content
  • From rogermoore435@yahoo.com Thu Mar 24 17:26:45 2005
    Return-Path: <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    X-Sender: rogermoore435@yahoo.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 70103 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2005 01:26:45 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
    by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Mar 2005 01:26:45 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO web52904.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.39.181)
    by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2005 01:26:45 -0000
    Received: (qmail 13831 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Mar 2005 01:26:44 -0000
    Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
    s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
    b=0WgDkrUREdkuJDAFZgsPyWr/S5pgKP4PxS8p2eV2YxwFEtCu1IQlcBFZuGPBbUDwCJQWhDY3WibPh9C8N94XR8EDrtnr0INGh6IBpq0/7bTnVSSFeIEBOaambnywHGmut7IUgXbKilneYeEut62WH1QuSZWbNa9igwsggFB/BCo= ;
    Message-ID: <20050325012644.13829.qmail@web52904.mail.yahoo.com>
    Received: from [68.36.156.12] by web52904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:26:44 PST
    Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:26:44 -0800 (PST)
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    In-Reply-To: 6667
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-97877858-1111714004=:13701"
    X-Originating-IP: 206.190.39.181
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
    From: Roger Moore <rogermoore435@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: [Colonial Numismatics] Fw: Geo. III, cast from a counterfeit, attached.
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=65078925
    X-Yahoo-Profile: rogermoore435

    --0-97877858-1111714004=:13701
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

    Byron, My other question is have you rung the casts? Do they ring? Did you do specific gravities on any of them? Roger

    Byron Weston <bkweston@verizon.net> wrote:
    --- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Roger Moore
    <rogermoore435@y...> wrote:
    > Thank you Byron. I am overwhelmed. I really like the double
    head. It seemsthat the major theme that runs through most of these
    are thick and filled in letters. One question, on 7579, why don't
    you think that this is not an old die with extensive die rust? In
    any case thank you for sharing these images. I have saved them all.
    Roger

    Actually I considered that, Roger, but concluded that the cast cooled
    with the reverse down, filling in the details on the reverse better,
    while the obverse bubbled somewhat as the metal cooled and shrank.
    The detail is otherwise there and the obverse surface granularity and
    lined appearance in the metal along the edge says cast to me.
    Pictures don't show these details well, especially on a better made
    cast, and would be much more apparent in an on-hands examination.
    Byron




    Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


    ---------------------------------
    Yahoo! Groups Links

    To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colonial-coins/

    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    colonial-coins-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



    --0-97877858-1111714004=:13701
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

    <DIV><STRONG>Byron,  My other question is have you rung the casts?  Do they ring?  Did you do specific gravities on any of them?  Roger</STRONG><BR><BR><B><I>Byron Weston <bkweston@verizon.net></I></B> wrote:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><TT><BR>--- In colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com, Roger Moore <BR><rogermoore435@y...> wrote:<BR>> Thank you Byron.  I am overwhelmed.  I really like the double <BR>head.  It seemsthat  the major theme that runs through most of these <BR>are thick and filled in letters.  One question, on 7579, why don't <BR>you think that this is not an old die with extensive die rust?  In <BR>any case thank you for sharing these images.  I have saved them all.  <BR>Roger<BR><BR>Actually I considered that, Roger, but concluded that the cast cooled <BR>with the reverse down, filling in the details on the reverse better, <BR>while the obverse bubbled somewhat as the metal cooled and shrank. <BR>The detail is otherwise there and the obverse surface granularity and <BR>lined appearance in the metal along the edge says cast to me. <BR>Pictures don't show these
    details well, especially on a better made <BR>cast, and would be much more apparent in an on-hands examination.<BR>Byron<BR><BR><BR><BR></TT><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
    --0-97877858-1111714004=:13701--
Source URL Date published
  • 2005-03-24
Volume
  • 1

Relationships

NNP Author