new 1781 variety.

文章內容

From clement.schettino@axcelis.com Wed Aug 10 08:47:55 2005
Return-Path: <Clement.Schettino@axcelis.com>
X-Sender: Clement.Schettino@axcelis.com
X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@egroups.com
Received: (qmail 35840 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 15:47:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Aug 2005 15:47:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ma800ex.axcelis.com) (12.146.8.101)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 15:47:49 -0000
Received: from ma701ex.axcelis.com ([172.23.245.55]) by ma800ex.axcelis.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:45:24 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C59DC2.8576E9CA"
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:45:23 -0400
Message-ID: <48BD517A6FBB734785C29F777E6576B00D87487D@ma701ex.axcelis.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: new 1781 variety.
Thread-Index: AcWdwoVUfsFeO2m+RF2qFksZ8riZuQ==
To: <ColNewsLetFndn@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: <colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com>,
<nonregalresearch@yahoogroups.com>
Return-Path: Clement.Schettino@axcelis.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2005 15:45:24.0551 (UTC) FILETIME=[85E4D570:01C59DC2]
X-Originating-IP: 12.146.8.101
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:5:0
From: "Schettino, Clement" <clement.schettino@axcelis.com>
Subject: new 1781 variety.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=60887536; y=yYxBK3a0J4qQunotXg12AWPbuLFXdovwjBqfIQ6r6LEwEuPmfQ
X-Yahoo-Profile: copperclem

------_=_NextPart_001_01C59DC2.8576E9CA
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C59DC2.8576E9CA"

------_=_NextPart_002_01C59DC2.8576E9CA
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey all,

=20

New 1781 variety.

=20

We did discuss this before but at that time I had such a poor scanned
image of this grounder that I just backed off. I now have a better image
and joined it with my present 1781 N.40-81A.

=20

I see a clear difference on the reverse between the Sprig and Sprig
Hand. I also see date numeral location differences. Actually there seems
to be minor differences to the obverses as well, especially the Ribbon
Ends. Granted this is not a good example being a grounder and I agree
that some of these differences could be the consequences of burial, BUT
not the differences in the Sprig placement, number of leaves and overall
Sprig design.

=20

I haven't had a chance to ask Gary to do an overlay yet but soon will.

=20

What do you think now?

=20

Thanks,

Clem

------_=_NextPart_002_01C59DC2.8576E9CA
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:sc=
hemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:off=
ice:smarttags" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"place"/>

<style>

</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

Hey all,<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

New 1781 variety.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

We did discuss this before but at that time I had such a
poor scanned image of this grounder that I just backed off. I now have a be=
tter
image and joined it with my present 1781 N.40-81A.<o:p></o:p>=


<o:p> </o:p>

I see a clear difference on the reverse between the Spri=
g
and Sprig Hand. I also see date numeral location differences. Actually ther=
e
seems to be minor differences to the obverses as well, especially the Ribbo=
n
Ends. Granted this is not a good example being a grounder and I agree that =
some
of these differences could be the consequences of burial, BUT not the
differences in the Sprig placement, number of leaves and overall Sprig desi=
gn.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

I haven’t had a chance to ask <st1:City w:st=3D"on=
"><st1:place
w:st=3D"on">Gary</st1:place></st1:City> to do an overlay yet but soon will=
.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

What do you think now?<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

Thanks,<o:p></o:p>

Clem<o:p></o:p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------_=_NextPart_002_01C59DC2.8576E9CA--

------_=_NextPart_001_01C59DC2.8576E9CA
Content-Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: 81 COMPARISON.doc

Content-Type: application/msword;
name="81 COMPARISON.doc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: 81 COMPARISON.doc
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="81 COMPARISON.doc"

------_=_NextPart_001_01C59DC2.8576E9CA--

來源網址

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/colonial-coins/info

發布日期

2005-08-10

體積

new 1781 variety. 上市 Deposited

人际关系

NNP作者