Standish Barry 3d Público Deposited

[Colonial Numismatics] Re

Contenido del artículo
  • From wnippe@acxiom.com Fri Sep 16 07:59:26 2005
    Return-Path: <wnippe@acxiom.com>
    X-Sender: wnippe@acxiom.com
    X-Apparently-To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Received: (qmail 59010 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2005 14:59:26 -0000
    Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
    by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Sep 2005 14:59:26 -0000
    Received: from unknown (HELO n4a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.38)
    by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2005 14:59:26 -0000
    Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
    Received: from [66.218.69.3] by n4.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Sep 2005 14:58:42 -0000
    Received: from [66.218.66.82] by mailer3.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Sep 2005 14:58:42 -0000
    Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:58:42 -0000
    To: colonial-coins@yahoogroups.com
    Message-ID: <dgemj2+q7io@eGroups.com>
    In-Reply-To: <054201c5ba6b$8518a8e0$f2fea8c0@DIANEJ33YVI95P>
    User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Length: 2824
    X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
    X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
    X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.38
    X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
    X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 198.160.96.25
    From: "Will Nipper" <wnippe@acxiom.com>
    Subject: [Colonial Numismatics] Re: Standish Barry 3d
    X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=27580835; y=rxlN042yZACzU5l2MNrASG3c3VJy-dsZJi0-l-DWqPO67QNy
    X-Yahoo-Profile: higleyman

    David,

    Yeah, I hear you and agree. I would just like to see some early
    reference that confirms a 1790(s) mintage. The denominaton 3d
    certainly hints at an early mintage.

    Where did the idea about the dies breaking after x strikings come
    from? There must be some early documentation. I just don't remember
    seeing anything definitive. I probably need to go back to Crosby --
    just don't remember what he said about it.

    If Standish Barry made them himself, he may not have been up to date
    on all of those technological develepments. As a first-time/one time
    coiner, he could have been going on his intuition of how it should be
    done. You gotta admit, that complex border with his name intertwined
    is pretty unusual for an American coin of any period. And he was,
    after all, a silver/goldsmith and not a coiner. Whoever made the dies
    evidently did not know how to make them so that they wouldn't break.
    Did he/they use a press or a hammer?

    It would also be interesting to know which of Barry's wares were
    displayed in the 1828 procession, even if they weren't his tokens. The
    article mentions several items, but not tokens. If the threepence
    portrait is Barry and not Washington, does it depict a man in his late
    twenties, as Barry would have been in 1790? He would have been about
    46 in 1809 and in his late sixties in 1828. The detail on the tiny
    tokens would be pretty remarkable for a man in his late sixties to
    execute.

    Ironically, the 1809 banner depicted "time" and carried the message "I
    transmit thee to the future." -- Barry did just that with his tokens.

    I have a chest-of-drawers that was made in North Carolina in the 1850s.
    It is clearly of a style that was common in the 1850-1870 period and
    it shows up in the 1859 inventory of a plantation. Even though
    circular saws (after 1850) and other advances were available at that
    time, this piece was made using older (17th/18th century) tools (can
    tell from the tool marks and style of the mortises and dovetails,)
    techniques, nails, etc. So, not everyone had access to the latest
    technology.

    This is just an opinion, but I also believe that Mott tokens were
    backdated and that 1789 might commemorate New York's hosting the US
    Capitol. I also think that the dies might have been used over a long
    period of time, beginning when large cents still weighed 208 grains,
    and possibly in both Britain and the US.

    Thanks,
    Will





    > Will, this is very interesting. I am hoping Roger comes up with
    some more
    > interesting stuff to go along with it. I would be more apt to go
    along with
    > the backdating for a commemorative, YET I think the entire style
    of the
    > token would be different, if it were struck even as late as 1809.
    19 years
    > or more, is alot of time in the technology of minting in the US.
    David
    >



URL de origen Fecha de publicación
  • 2005-09-16
Volumen
  • 1

Relaciones

Autor NNP